Hillary allowed China to raid her bathroom server which was full of classified info.

Obama gave Iran nuclear secrets.

And that's just scratching the surface.

According to Jack Smith:

Our laws that protect national defense information are critical to the safety and security of the United States, and they must be enforced. Violations of those laws put our country at risk.

Now we all know that before anyone tries to indict a leftist Democrat icon, you have to appease that icon's raging leftist supporters by indicting Trump first. Which brings us to Q 3716:

u/#q3716

This week, both Trump and the DOJ are emphasizing the unsealing of an indictment. Yesterday, when Trump said, "The seal is broken," he was talking directly to Anons. He probably thought he couldn't make the hint more obvious.

The Department of Justice released on Friday an unsealed federal indictment of former President Donald Trump.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/read-the-full-trump-indictment-on-mishandling-of-classified-documents

Q's posts always play with our assumptions. 3716 had us assuming that the person being indicted would trigger a mass awakening. Maybe instead of the person, it's what the indictment uncovers, like classified info from Trump's Mar-a-Lago stash that proves Obama or Hillary committed treason.

3716 also had us assuming that the first person being indicted would be the same as the first person arrested. In the scenario I'm describing, that doesn't have to be the case. Trump can be indicted, and the information uncovered during discovery can lead to Obama or Hillary being arrested, which will "Verify action and confirm future direction."

Y'all ready for the Summer of Love part Deux?

They will fight but you are ready.