There's some truth to that statement, but it's coming from a very different perspective.
It's the same perspective about how people often don't like bible thumpers always preaching about their religions, or people that would rather pray when they are at a difficult point in their lives rather than standing up and finding their own solutions.
Me personally, I take the whole Q posts just at face value. Sure there are some interesting q-proofs or cross-referencing leading to the idea of devolution. All these really do is just setting up hope that the "white hats" are actively working against the "black hats."
Hope is nice and all, but it's a pacifist and passive way of approaching life. And to be frank, a pathetic way to live life. Relying on others, or a higher power to sort out the vile shit in life? Do people have little faith in themselves, that they have have some control to make a difference, no matter how small?
Real change requires not trusting that a higher power is taking its time to do what's right, but an individual strong in their own confidence to take it upon themselves to make that change themselves.
For thousands of years, people pray to their religions hoping miracles will come in order to sort out the bullshit in life. Do you think it's ever going to come just out of nowhere? Would you rather wait for that change to come or take charge and be the change yourself?
Would you rather spend a 1000 hours praying to your own religion for a cure for cancer or would you rather spend a 1000 hours researching, cross referencing, learning new concepts, experimenting, reading peoples' own stories to figure out cancer yourself?
This perspective is why there is a whole set of people who are against just blindly following q.
It can even be suggested that q has brought in this era of awakening by our forthright to think for ourselves, that each and one of us are more than capable to read in between the veiled darkness.
Actually, the truth is historically that real and sincere religious practice is all about allowing the transcendent to work in my life and through me. That's always been the driving force behind religion, but this idea that its really about sit back and wait for miracles. False concept, and not even true.
It can even be suggested that q
I'm yet to find any Q tracker who even suggests that it might be otherwise than this.
What you are describing and talking about is a very small minority that is not an actual reflection of the views or attitudes of the majority who accept that Q is a legit operation, and not a larp.
There's some truth to that statement, but it's coming from a very different perspective.
It's the same perspective about how people often don't like bible thumpers always preaching about their religions, or people that would rather pray when they are at a difficult point in their lives rather than standing up and finding their own solutions.
Me personally, I take the whole Q posts just at face value. Sure there are some interesting q-proofs or cross-referencing leading to the idea of devolution. All these really do is just setting up hope that the "white hats" are actively working against the "black hats."
Hope is nice and all, but it's a pacifist and passive way of approaching life. And to be frank, a pathetic way to live life. Relying on others, or a higher power to sort out the vile shit in life? Do people have little faith in themselves, that they have have some control to make a difference, no matter how small?
Real change requires not trusting that a higher power is taking its time to do what's right, but an individual strong in their own confidence to take it upon themselves to make that change themselves.
For thousands of years, people pray to their religions hoping miracles will come in order to sort out the bullshit in life. Do you think it's ever going to come just out of nowhere? Would you rather wait for that change to come or take charge and be the change yourself?
Would you rather spend a 1000 hours praying to your own religion for a cure for cancer or would you rather spend a 1000 hours researching, cross referencing, learning new concepts, experimenting, reading peoples' own stories to figure out cancer yourself?
This perspective is why there is a whole set of people who are against just blindly following q.
It can even be suggested that q has brought in this era of awakening by our forthright to think for ourselves, that each and one of us are more than capable to read in between the veiled darkness.
Actually, the truth is historically that real and sincere religious practice is all about allowing the transcendent to work in my life and through me. That's always been the driving force behind religion, but this idea that its really about sit back and wait for miracles. False concept, and not even true.
I'm yet to find any Q tracker who even suggests that it might be otherwise than this.
What you are describing and talking about is a very small minority that is not an actual reflection of the views or attitudes of the majority who accept that Q is a legit operation, and not a larp.