As some may know, the SCOTUS docketed the Brunson case on June 22nd. They began hearing the case and should have a decision by Saturday June 24th. The results would lead to annulment of the 2020 Election which would dissolve the Biden Administration and the majority of Congress for not investigating the fraud of the 2020 election.
SCOTUS could have denied it on Thursday but are continuing arguments. The case was accepted under a rule 11. A rule 11 has never been docketed in this manner by anyone outside of a federal government case that was brought in the 1970's. Rule 11 means the case is of imperative public importance (SCOTUS had to decide that and docket this in that manner).
Prayers up warriors - I know the Brunson case has received many critics but this would definitely qualify as a swamp flush.
https://static-assets-1.truthsocial.com/tmtg:prime-ts-assets/media_attachments/files/110/573/369/156/807/508/original/2b23b0b6dff1c07f.jpg
https://truthsocial.com/users/lastminutesewing/statuses/110591944916990038
There are videos posted that cover the Brunson case in detail.
It has made its rounds to SCOTUS 2 times before and has been rejected immediately.
Each time however the Brunsons have changed their approach.
This time is unique as its under Rule 11.
When a case is docketed the SCOTUS reviews the arguments and decides if they want to take it to trial for a verdict. In this scenario, the fact that they are holding multiple days of discussions on it is interesting.
Its in oral arguments and has been going on for a couple days - that is the sauce. Maybe we will know more next week on whether SCOTUS is going to take it to trial and decision.
https://truthsocial.com/users/Sapioplex/statuses/110575386184787756
There are two different cases, from two of the Brunson brothers. I'm not sure the difference between the two. I saw an interview with Loy a few days ago, and the person never asked him how this one was different.