As some may know, the SCOTUS docketed the Brunson case on June 22nd. They began hearing the case and should have a decision by Saturday June 24th. The results would lead to annulment of the 2020 Election which would dissolve the Biden Administration and the majority of Congress for not investigating the fraud of the 2020 election.
SCOTUS could have denied it on Thursday but are continuing arguments. The case was accepted under a rule 11. A rule 11 has never been docketed in this manner by anyone outside of a federal government case that was brought in the 1970's. Rule 11 means the case is of imperative public importance (SCOTUS had to decide that and docket this in that manner).
Prayers up warriors - I know the Brunson case has received many critics but this would definitely qualify as a swamp flush.
They weren't hearing the case, it was a conference to decide whether it should go to a full hearing. His brother's case was very similar or maybe the same (I haven't heard anyone tell us how they were different), and that one came up for consideration twice and they decided not to send the case forward twice already.
If I am not mistaken, this is the first time it made it to conference.
I believe it's the 1st time that Loy's case made it to conference. His brother's case, however, made it to conference twice and wasn't put forward for trail either time. The other brother's case was Raland J Brunson v Alma S Adams.