I wasn't going to comment on this because SOME anons here have no clue what the Brunson certiorari even said. I read it, beginning to end twice. FIRST, they were asking the Courts to throw out Congress. Literally, arrest Congress for violating its oath. SECOND, Frens, if you really thought that was a possibility, you are not an adult Q researcher. I am sorry if that hurts ur feels, but believing the Courts would entertain that notion is fuking childish. Yeah, the dooming here is kinda funny when you talk about the courts being corrupted in THIS BRUNSON context. I GUARANTEE 95% of the people posting here NEVER actually read the RfC. Not even a sentence.
I wasn't going to comment on this because SOME anons here have no clue what the Brunson certiorari even said. I read it, beginning to end twice. FIRST, they were asking the Courts to throw out Congress. Literally, arrest Congress for violating its oath. SECOND, Frens, if you really thought that was a possibility, you are not an adult Q researcher. I am sorry if that hurts ur feels, but believing the Courts would entertain that notion is fuking childish. Yeah, the dooming here is kinda funny when you talk about the courts being corrupted in THIS BRUNSON context. I GUARANTEE 95% of the people posting here NEVER actually read the RfC. Not even a sentence.
Nailed It!