Something I've been wrestling with lately, I'm in many different groups of freedom oriented individuals, and at a risk of sounding like a fag, I feel like a lot of us are missing the point of this whole great awakening process, mainly, WWG1WGA.
Not that any one post here has been upsetting to me, it's more a local group where one or 2 individuals seem to be pretty hateful towards a group or 2, and It's hard to watch from the sidelines, but also not interfere with their individual journey and the emotions that come with the learning of the crimes against humanity that have occurred over recent history.
I too, cannot stand the flagrant assault on masculinity and the trans war going on, as well as the fact that one denomination of elite humans happen to be Jewish, but, I have to always draw my emotions in when I see any post that is filled with hate towards any group of people.
Sure, some groups like pedos, epstein cohorts, corrupt politicians, and so on deserve a very grim fate, it serves the individual soul very little benefit to harbor hate and anger towards those lost souls.
Maybe I just feel like a reminder to all is in order, that we need to conduct ourselves to a higher standard when faced with the evils of today, and avoid the emotions of negative orientation, in exchange for true powerful energy like Jesus, or Trump, when facing absolute evil.
As the times shift towards the full disclosure and tribunals, we will do better by the community by becoming the hard masculine (or strong feminine) energies who hold the line of righteousness without expressing hate or malice. It is always better to be stoic in the face of evil than to stoop to their level.
I look forward to the next few years of nail biting anticipation and excitement as we watch the cabal and luciferian orders crumble, and I pray the lord can guide us all to being the best we can be in achieving the christ like disposition towards the coming challenges, I love all you pedes more than I ever thought I was capable of loving anonymous strangers, and cannot wait for the after party to this movie.
Thanks for listening haha. Just on a late night ramble, if you read this and resonate, I appreciate you, fren.
I think you're confusing man's actions in the name of the church, with the teachings of Jesus himself.
Did Jesus wage war on any human? Demons, sure, but he would cast them out of the human to save the human.
I have a really hard time believing Jesus would have been all Gung ho on the crusades or blood shed. In fact, he had the power to destroy if he so chose to, but instead, took the cross on himself to avoid needless blood shed.
I don't argue that retribution needs to occur at times, and you can't let the evil propagate unchecked, there is a fine line between emotionally charged retaliation and righteous judgement.
I do agree with you here, my main point was just that intention and emotions have a large part to play, and we often need to check our selves when faced with these trying times and choices. The founding fathers were in a position of power given to them through righteousness, we must aim to position ourselves mentally in a similar fashion.
No, it isn't. That the Catholic Church had a stranglehold on the faith and the Bible for some 1000 years does not make any of this new. Nor does them "removing" anyone who disagreed with their interpretation mean those people didn't continue to exist throughout the ages.
Further, none of this is true unless you make scripture out of single verses. This is not how the Bible is to be read. Since the Bible can not contradict itself, it must be read as a whole. It doesn't matter if you can jumble together a few dozen verses that could be said to justify all that shit, if even one verse truly says you are wrong, you are shit out of luck on your supposedly valid reading.
When read as a whole, it is impossible to get any of this warmonger shit where we launch 'holy crusades' against evil people and act as Knights in shining armor fighting evil.
When God says not to get revenge and to leave vengeance to Him in the OT, and then reiterates in the NT to turn the other cheek, to love our enemies, and to leave vengeance to Him, it's quite clear what kind of message is being given on the whole.
Irrelevant. What Muslims do in their Satan-created religion does not matter to Christians. In fact, it further confirms that what you speak is of Satan, not God.
(Also, as an aside: Christian France? Don't make me laugh. The west has barely a glimmer of Christian thought among it. Most people are lukewarm or outright deny the divinity and truth of God)
The Bible says to hate sin. What is your point? Your point relies on inserting things that it doesn't say as an extension of what it does say. Seeing as all Man is sinful, this is bound to lead not away from sin but to it.
Further, I love that you brought up "buy a sword". I figured you would. It illustrates beautifully your lack of perspective on this issue. The reason being that when Peter used the sword, Jesus rebuked him and healed the man's ear. Clearly He did not intend them to take up swords to slay their enemies. Jesus explicitly states the reason for the swords, which is to fulfill the scripture as written.
Jesus brings a sword because He is God. As God says in the Bible, vengeance is His. You are not challenging my primary assertions such as this.
There is nothing to grapple with. Christ won 2000 years ago. Nothing they do will change that, and winning is not possible for the followers of Satan. You make these grand assertions that are simply not true. Namely, that God lied or failed when He said he would preserve His word, which is effectively a requirement for the assertion that Christianity has been "infiltrated" to be true. If the Word is preserved, no infiltration is possible or is very hard. We can simply read the Word of God and see what it says.
What you are talking about is simply not in the Bible, and you've made barely a reference to scripture to support your claim that it is. There is no weaponization here, I just don't see much support if any for violence in the Bible. There is certainly some stuff that alludes to self-defense being valid if it is the only way, but to extend that to your 'holy crusades are valid' narrative is arbitrary and unsupported by the Bible. There are cases where the death penalty is doled out, but that again is a far cry from the 'holy crusades' idea where doing what the Muslims do for their god Satan is somehow a good thing.
Even when it comes to the death penalty, while I still currently support it for the most heinous of crimes, I'm not aware of any support for it in the New Testament. Whereas the NT reasserts many things, the death penalty it does not reassert. It reasserts that homosexuality is bad, but does not reassert that the death penalty is to be doled out for it.
I generally look to this, at least initially, as a simple way to determine if something from the Old Testament still applies. Certain things were explicitly said to no longer matter; circumcision, dietary laws. Certain things were explicitly reiterated as bad; homosexuality, murder, lying, lust. Then there are some things that were neither. I find that to answer those questions you look to the rest of the Bible. And when you do this you don't find holy crusades, you find this: https://www.openbible.info/topics/revenge
Romans 12:20-21 Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give him drink: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head. Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.
Another thing I'd add is that it is quite ironic you bring up infiltration. Earlier I said, infiltration is not possible without God having lied or failed regarding preserving His Word. While this is true, there was a time when the Catholic Church had a stranglehold on the Bible and the faith to the point they did away with anyone who disagreed with them. While God did not fail, and the Bible was preserved, it was hard for a time to easily access it for most people.
Point being, the way I currently see it is that the Catholic Church infiltrated Christianity, churned out a bunch of Pharisaic, false doctrines, and what you are espousing now is the last dying breath of those doctrines.
The evangelicals of today started when people realized that the Bible didn't say what the Church said it did. They didn't make up a bunch of new shit, they went back to the good old stuff from before the Catholic Church took over the whole thing. They realized that what the Church was teaching was not in the Bible. They read the Bible and did what it said.
*1 Peter 3:8-18
8 Finally, be ye all of one mind, having compassion one of another, love as brethren, be pitiful, be courteous: 9 not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing: but contrariwise blessing; knowing that ye are thereunto called, that ye should inherit a blessing. 10 For he that will love life, and see good days, let him refrain his tongue from evil, and his lips that they speak no guile: 11 let him eschew evil, and do good; let him seek peace, and ensue it. 12 For the eyes of the Lord are over the righteous, and his ears are open unto their prayers: but the face of the Lord is against them that do evil.*
13 And who is he that will harm you, if ye be followers of that which is good? 14 But and if ye suffer for righteousness’ sake, happy are ye: and be not afraid of their terror, neither be troubled; 15 but sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear: 16 having a good conscience; that, whereas they speak evil of you, as of evildoers, they may be ashamed that falsely accuse your good conversation in Christ. 17 For it is better, if the will of God be so, that ye suffer for well doing, than for evil doing. 18 For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit:
Our ultimate goal is to emulate Christ, as He was perfect, is it not? How then does anything other than pacifism, which I myself struggle with calling valid, as it seems to contradict our natural inclinations as humans, emulate Christ?