My own experience is that when people are just starting to ask questions its best to stick to crumbs they can independently verify as factual. Trying to prove that a congressman who is very popular amongst the lefties is a pedophile is probably one of the advanced topics.
If you want to redpill about pedos, best to start with the original pizzagate digs - just the art work found in the houses of those big names. Most people do get disturbed when they see some of that stuff, even if they try to convince themselves that its all "art". You can use those openings and dose more from the pizzagate digs (coded messages, etc).
Its a very long process, but redpill has to come from the inside, not from outside. All we can do is drop crumbs.
My own experience is that when people are just starting to ask questions its best to stick to crumbs they can independently verify as factual. Trying to prove that a congressman who is very popular amongst the lefties is a pedophile is probably one of the advanced topics.
If you want to redpill about pedos, best to start with the original pizzagate digs - just the art work found in the houses of those big names. Most people do get disturbed when they see some of that stuff, even if they try to convince themselves that its all "art". You can use those openings and dose more from the pizzagate digs (coded messages, etc).
Its a very long process, but redpill has to come from the inside, not from outside. All we can do is drop crumbs.
... and ask questions. There's a reason the Socratic method works so well. So well, in fact, that Q used it.