Drug Tests for the ENTIRE White House Staff ASAP. It's against Federal Law to "(a) Being under the influence, using or possessing any narcotic drugs, hallucinogens, marijuana, barbiturates, or amphetamines;" - The Great Awakening

262

Drug Tests for the ENTIRE White House Staff ASAP. It's against Federal Law to "(a) Being under the influence, using or possessing any narcotic drugs, hallucinogens, marijuana, barbiturates, or amphetamines;" 🚔 Crime & Democrats 💸

posted 1 year ago by _Big_Mike_Robinson 1 year ago by _Big_Mike_Robinson +263 / -1

§ 102-74.400 What is the policy concerning the possession and use of narcotics and other drugs?

Except in cases where the drug is being used as prescribed for a patient by a licensed physician, all persons entering in or on Federal property are prohibited from—

(a) Being under the influence, using or possessing any narcotic drugs, hallucinogens, marijuana, barbiturates, or amphetamines; or

(b) Operating a motor vehicle on the property while under the influence of alcoholic beverages, narcotic drugs, hallucinogens, marijuana, barbiturates, or amphetamines.

https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-41/subtitle-C/chapter-102/subchapter-C/part-102-74/subpart-C

34 comments

34 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (34)

sorted by:

▲ 3 ▼

– russiah 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

The drug has to come from somewhere else which adds the trafficking element to it.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– JizmJunky 1 point 1 year ago +2 / -1

Just possession I'm afraid. At least getting caught on non federal land this would just be a possession charge. One baggy, personal amount. Misdemeanor. In my state you would be able to keep it and run free SMH

permalink parent save report block reply

– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0