That does not come close to answering the question. It also ignores logic. What I said has nothing to do with putting faith in the cabal. I expect them to do every single dastardly thing imaginable. Changing scripture does not mean I have faith in the cabal. It means this lines up to what they are not only capable of but what they would do. I suppose you could have said God would not allow them to mess with his word but if this planet truly belongs to the dark side, how can you possibly trust anything in it?
That is what I said. Maybe poorly, and I'll admit the phrasing of "putting faith in the cabal" may have been a miss in terms of my intended meaning.
I'll rephrase it:
You either have a greater faith in God's power to preserve His Word, or you have a greater faith in the cabal's ability to change it.
And the answer is you can't; you can't trust anything in the world, but you can trust in God, and by extension, His infallible revelation to Man.
The notion that the Bible has been changed is rooted solely in a lack of faith in God to preserve it, while also giving the cabal more credit than they deserve in comparison to Him.
To me, this is the most illogical position one could hold, hence why I believe it to be solely a lack of faith. The idea that the all-powerful creator of time, space, and matter, who exists outside of His creation, could fail to preserve His revelation to us if He willed it? This is absurdity. How could such a thing even be possible?
Here's a question. If you believe scripture to be twisted, this means you believe it was originally from God, correct? So is the part where it says God will preserve His word from God or from the cabal? Did the cabal put it in so we would believe their corrupted version and think it infallible? But why wouldn't God say the same thing? Surely if the all-knowing creator decided to give us revelation about Him, He wouldn't just allow these people to twist it? Especially since He knows full well that is their plan if He allows them to.
So why is it so hard to believe God preemptively told us He would preserve His Word, and to further believe that He actively does so?
Its so hard to believe because we know that written word HAS been played with. Different councils of men have added or removed texts through the years. If they do that why not just remove or add parts of books? Seems to me there may have been pretty good evidence of reincarnation removed. We look back at history and can see wars fought over different interpretations of that book.
Here's a question. If you believe scripture to be twisted, this means you believe it was originally from God, correct? So is the part where it says God will preserve His word from God or from the cabal? Did the cabal put it in so we would believe their corrupted version and think it infallible? But why wouldn't God say the same thing? Surely if the all-knowing creator decided to give us revelation about Him, He wouldn't just allow these people to twist it? Especially since He knows full well that is their plan if He allows them to.
Not necessarily. It maybe or it may not be. It could very well all be fiction. There is nothing in that book that could not have been written by man. There is nowhere that when I read a passage I am so blown away that it must be divine. Satan been given dominion over the earth until Jesus returns, right? Maybe ALL of it is bullshit. If an advanced race actually did create us or at least improve us, what better way to control us? Every single miracle in the bible , that comes to mind right now , could have been performed with advanced technology. Things that would look like magic. What really is magic? Manipulation of ones environment.
You can put your faith in God's power, or you can put your faith in the cabal's power.
You can pick only one.
That does not come close to answering the question. It also ignores logic. What I said has nothing to do with putting faith in the cabal. I expect them to do every single dastardly thing imaginable. Changing scripture does not mean I have faith in the cabal. It means this lines up to what they are not only capable of but what they would do. I suppose you could have said God would not allow them to mess with his word but if this planet truly belongs to the dark side, how can you possibly trust anything in it?
That is what I said. Maybe poorly, and I'll admit the phrasing of "putting faith in the cabal" may have been a miss in terms of my intended meaning.
I'll rephrase it:
You either have a greater faith in God's power to preserve His Word, or you have a greater faith in the cabal's ability to change it.
And the answer is you can't; you can't trust anything in the world, but you can trust in God, and by extension, His infallible revelation to Man.
The notion that the Bible has been changed is rooted solely in a lack of faith in God to preserve it, while also giving the cabal more credit than they deserve in comparison to Him.
To me, this is the most illogical position one could hold, hence why I believe it to be solely a lack of faith. The idea that the all-powerful creator of time, space, and matter, who exists outside of His creation, could fail to preserve His revelation to us if He willed it? This is absurdity. How could such a thing even be possible?
Here's a question. If you believe scripture to be twisted, this means you believe it was originally from God, correct? So is the part where it says God will preserve His word from God or from the cabal? Did the cabal put it in so we would believe their corrupted version and think it infallible? But why wouldn't God say the same thing? Surely if the all-knowing creator decided to give us revelation about Him, He wouldn't just allow these people to twist it? Especially since He knows full well that is their plan if He allows them to.
So why is it so hard to believe God preemptively told us He would preserve His Word, and to further believe that He actively does so?
Its so hard to believe because we know that written word HAS been played with. Different councils of men have added or removed texts through the years. If they do that why not just remove or add parts of books? Seems to me there may have been pretty good evidence of reincarnation removed. We look back at history and can see wars fought over different interpretations of that book.
Not necessarily. It maybe or it may not be. It could very well all be fiction. There is nothing in that book that could not have been written by man. There is nowhere that when I read a passage I am so blown away that it must be divine. Satan been given dominion over the earth until Jesus returns, right? Maybe ALL of it is bullshit. If an advanced race actually did create us or at least improve us, what better way to control us? Every single miracle in the bible , that comes to mind right now , could have been performed with advanced technology. Things that would look like magic. What really is magic? Manipulation of ones environment.