...and one might want to include the disclaimer that "nothing within any Q messaging is indicative of violence, but instead actually promotes peace in the sense that it suggests people of this world should trust the plan. whether the "plan" is genuine or not is immaterial, but instead the fact that a heavily influenced anon would trust in a plan, a plan that doesnt involve anons using violence."

a statement along these lines should be bulletproof enough imho for big name people of influence to say it publicly