In my experience, I have yet to come across a Q or "qanon" critic who has actually read more than a few Q posts and gone down the rabbit hole of q proofs, deltas, and "coincidences." None of the critics have any real sauce or any evidence that Q is a larp.
Yeah that's easy to say, but I have no interest in wasting my time trying to convince the Q critics. The evidence has been available for years. Why should I be burdened with laying out proof for people who want to live with blinders on and not even look? On the contrary, the people claiming that Q is bullshit have never offered anything to support their claim.
You can't prove a negative, though. That's why in courts they have to prove someone guilty, not prove someone innocent. Think about it. If it were proving someone innocent, then you could be picked up today for murder, and stay in jail until you proved that you weren't a murderer. This is what the deep state wants. We want REALITY. Innocent until proven guilty. Period.
I don't disagree. Can't prove a negative, but the evidence in the positive is out there, available. Anyone who wants to argue the negative should probably bring something to the table that at least attempts to disprove those positives. If they don't want to bring anything, I'm not going to waste my time with the discussion.
In my experience, I have yet to come across a Q or "qanon" critic who has actually read more than a few Q posts and gone down the rabbit hole of q proofs, deltas, and "coincidences." None of the critics have any real sauce or any evidence that Q is a larp.
Yeah that's easy to say, but I have no interest in wasting my time trying to convince the Q critics. The evidence has been available for years. Why should I be burdened with laying out proof for people who want to live with blinders on and not even look? On the contrary, the people claiming that Q is bullshit have never offered anything to support their claim.
You can't prove a negative, though. That's why in courts they have to prove someone guilty, not prove someone innocent. Think about it. If it were proving someone innocent, then you could be picked up today for murder, and stay in jail until you proved that you weren't a murderer. This is what the deep state wants. We want REALITY. Innocent until proven guilty. Period.
I don't disagree. Can't prove a negative, but the evidence in the positive is out there, available. Anyone who wants to argue the negative should probably bring something to the table that at least attempts to disprove those positives. If they don't want to bring anything, I'm not going to waste my time with the discussion.