Once again, Cakes is here to condescendingly tell others what Q is or isn't. He spent the better part of 3 years calling Q fake, blocking Q followers on Twitter, and lashing out at anyone that brought up the topic. Do yourselves a favor and decide on your own what Q is or isn't. Don't let this sloppy, arrogant internet personality tell you what to believe. He's in it for the clicks now
60 Minutes gave an interview to the QAnon shaman idiot.
So when I checked Twitter this morning, "QAnonCult" and "QAnon Shaman" were both trending.
Twitter user had a great point: focusing on the QAnon stupidity allows MSM to avoid having to talk about thousands of nursing home deaths.
Kurt Schlichter is right: the only people still babbling about QAnon these days are the people using it to paint all of MAGA as domestic terrorists.
People link to Brian Cates like he's some inspired bastion of wisdom about all things Q, but the truth is that for the first four years of the Q movement, Cates called it "Qanon stupidity". He thought (probably still thinks) we're all stupid. His claim was that our sole purpose was for the MSM to paint MAGA chads like himself as domestic terrorists.
I'm not looking up the sauce now, but Cates was also a Never Trumper at one point.
And one more thing, to all those who claim his writing is spectacular.
Understand what I'm saying here. Read it carefully. Don't just jump to react.
The implication is that you wouldn't understand what he's saying, so he's asking you to make a special effort.
The implication is that you have to read it carefully, his assumption is you wouldn't without being asked.
The implication is that you will carelessly jump to react, and he has to take extra steps to make certain you won't do it, like a nanny or schoolmarm instructing children.
He writes like he thinks we're all fucking idiots. His tone is full blown overboard condescension. This type of writing influences no one, in fact it does the exact opposite. It makes people take the contrarian view if for no other than he's being a condescending dick.
I wouldn't be surprised if that's a feature, not a flaw.
Once again, Cakes is here to condescendingly tell others what Q is or isn't. He spent the better part of 3 years calling Q fake, blocking Q followers on Twitter, and lashing out at anyone that brought up the topic. Do yourselves a favor and decide on your own what Q is or isn't. Don't let this sloppy, arrogant internet personality tell you what to believe. He's in it for the clicks now
Brian Cates, less than 2 years ago, called Q followers "terrorists".
https://social.quodverum.com/@drawandstrike/105833146425154098
Brian Cates @[email protected] Mar 5, 2021
People link to Brian Cates like he's some inspired bastion of wisdom about all things Q, but the truth is that for the first four years of the Q movement, Cates called it "Qanon stupidity". He thought (probably still thinks) we're all stupid. His claim was that our sole purpose was for the MSM to paint MAGA chads like himself as domestic terrorists.
I'm not looking up the sauce now, but Cates was also a Never Trumper at one point.
And one more thing, to all those who claim his writing is spectacular.
The implication is that you wouldn't understand what he's saying, so he's asking you to make a special effort.
The implication is that you have to read it carefully, his assumption is you wouldn't without being asked.
The implication is that you will carelessly jump to react, and he has to take extra steps to make certain you won't do it, like a nanny or schoolmarm instructing children.
He writes like he thinks we're all fucking idiots. His tone is full blown overboard condescension. This type of writing influences no one, in fact it does the exact opposite. It makes people take the contrarian view if for no other than he's being a condescending dick.
I wouldn't be surprised if that's a feature, not a flaw.