Normies say that because the media told them "qanon stuff is crazy fringe conspiracy theories". Not because they came to the forums and read anything for themselves.
So no matter who started getting this info to the public they would always be jeered by the media as "lunatic fringe". Since we know the media would always smear truth-tellers as kooks, it makes no sense "the deep state" would also reveal their own secrets with the sole purpose of packaging it under a "kook" label. Why take the chance? I followed politics for 20 years and conspiracy theories for 7 or 8 before Q came along and revealed things i still had never known.
The media, hollywood, the deep state, none of them have anything to gain from the general public thinking and researching corruption for themselves, so there is no way they would have started the Q movement.
They are trying, but their ability to mock people into blocking out truth continues to be obliterated by their exposed lies on Russia, The Laptop, Fake News, JFK's death, every other thing they called a "debunked" wacky conspiracy theory. We are winning the Information War because they "cry Q" the same way the boy cried wolf. Except in their case, them calling something debunked is almost like a fact check.
We werent talking about Sound of Freedom. We were talking about Q's purpose. You said his purpose was to make people think this stuff is crazy. But that's ridiculous, because any truth teller will be labeled crazy. They are saying Caviezel is crazy now, too. Was that his purpose?
That doesnt even make sense
Normies say that because the media told them "qanon stuff is crazy fringe conspiracy theories". Not because they came to the forums and read anything for themselves.
So no matter who started getting this info to the public they would always be jeered by the media as "lunatic fringe". Since we know the media would always smear truth-tellers as kooks, it makes no sense "the deep state" would also reveal their own secrets with the sole purpose of packaging it under a "kook" label. Why take the chance? I followed politics for 20 years and conspiracy theories for 7 or 8 before Q came along and revealed things i still had never known.
The media, hollywood, the deep state, none of them have anything to gain from the general public thinking and researching corruption for themselves, so there is no way they would have started the Q movement.
How's that working out for them?
They are trying, but their ability to mock people into blocking out truth continues to be obliterated by their exposed lies on Russia, The Laptop, Fake News, JFK's death, every other thing they called a "debunked" wacky conspiracy theory. We are winning the Information War because they "cry Q" the same way the boy cried wolf. Except in their case, them calling something debunked is almost like a fact check.
We werent talking about Sound of Freedom. We were talking about Q's purpose. You said his purpose was to make people think this stuff is crazy. But that's ridiculous, because any truth teller will be labeled crazy. They are saying Caviezel is crazy now, too. Was that his purpose?