So, I did read/watch https://anonfamous.substack.com/ which does not accuse Mr. Ballard of anything, just lays out information via photo, websites and video.
Why was this film produced 6-7 years ago?
Why was it "held on ice" until clearly NCSWIC?
Why (review the substack) all the association and family association when we KNOW the LDS IS involved in child trafficking?
When a forest fire is about to/or is burning out of control..... you create a "backburn" to block the fire and lessen the impact/fallout.
When a flood is coming you dig a trench to guide/channel the flow of water to where YOU WANT IT TO GO.
My questions are:
Why are Ballard, Gibson, Caviezel and Walburg plus others all associated with this same talent Agency (Anne Heche now deceased as well) (see substack) suddenly coming out hard against child trafficking in complete unison?
Why are the names not being NAMED?
What is REALLY coming out that they are getting ahead of to steer it? (think Pizzagate)?
We are so "oh the MSM is against SOF so this is legit" instead of MSM is CIA and this is a psyop to lessen the impact of "real truths" (like children in cages all their lives, bred for adrenochrome and organs and sacrifice) and SOF is the tip of the iceberg (meaning those complicit are not living in back allies paying 50 bucks a pop for a child but are in the government, heads of corporations, royalty, etc spending tens of thousands to "buy a disposable child/human for any means")
Question everything............means everything. SOF is Great. It does shine light on Child trafficking, but it is "child trafficking lite".
So, in honoring the true Q code of "question everything" I do not see why the name calling and emotional response to questioning is a thing. I had heard about Ballard and Clinton Foundation connection at the time of the Haiti earthquake, and it was already on my radar. Hunters (501c3 child rescue charities) become the Hunted might be a thing.
So, I did read/watch https://anonfamous.substack.com/ which does not accuse Mr. Ballard of anything, just lays out information via photo, websites and video.
Why was this film produced 6-7 years ago? Why was it "held on ice" until clearly NCSWIC? Why (review the substack) all the association and family association when we KNOW the LDS IS involved in child trafficking?
When a forest fire is about to/or is burning out of control..... you create a "backburn" to block the fire and lessen the impact/fallout. When a flood is coming you dig a trench to guide/channel the flow of water to where YOU WANT IT TO GO.
My questions are: Why are Ballard, Gibson, Caviezel and Walburg plus others all associated with this same talent Agency (Anne Heche now deceased as well) (see substack) suddenly coming out hard against child trafficking in complete unison? Why are the names not being NAMED? What is REALLY coming out that they are getting ahead of to steer it? (think Pizzagate)?
We are so "oh the MSM is against SOF so this is legit" instead of MSM is CIA and this is a psyop to lessen the impact of "real truths" (like children in cages all their lives, bred for adrenochrome and organs and sacrifice) and SOF is the tip of the iceberg (meaning those complicit are not living in back allies paying 50 bucks a pop for a child but are in the government, heads of corporations, royalty, etc spending tens of thousands to "buy a disposable child/human for any means")
Question everything............means everything. SOF is Great. It does shine light on Child trafficking, but it is "child trafficking lite".
So, in honoring the true Q code of "question everything" I do not see why the name calling and emotional response to questioning is a thing. I had heard about Ballard and Clinton Foundation connection at the time of the Haiti earthquake, and it was already on my radar. Hunters (501c3 child rescue charities) become the Hunted might be a thing.