110
posted ago by CasuallyObservant ago by CasuallyObservant +110 / -0

ASK YOURSELF THIS:

  • It all comes down to this question. Were the rights of the people violated by Trump? Was Trump trying to win though he actually lost? Or was Trump, upholding the Constitution, seeking to expose the election fraud and show the true will of the people?

  • Trump sought every avenue he could to get the truth revealed, and was blocked at every turn. Trump peacefully left the white house knowing full well that the courts never even heard the evidence and denied him standing. This violated Trump’s rights and our Constitutional rights.

  • And yet Pence has the nerve to say that Trump "put himself over the Constitution". Those that voted to certify on January 7th, put themselves over the Constitution without even a consideration of the evidence of election fraud. Even though just a few hours earlier over 100 congressmen came with evidence of election fraud. Congress had solid examples of election fraud evidence in their hands, and they chose to ignore it. Congress, sworn to uphold the Constitution had evidence of the people's rights being violated in an election and they would not even look at it before voting on the issue.

  • That night I watched Pence say, "I MUST count the votes and certify", full knowing of the violations against the people's choice in the election. Pence and Congress violated 3 U.S. Code § 15 (d) (2) (D) which states that "No vote or paper from any other State shall be acted upon until the objections previously made to any vote or paper from any State, and other questions arising in the matter, shall have been finally disposed of." And instead of upholding this and investigating the election fraud they simply voted without putting to rest any of the questions and concerns brought to them.

  • Members of Congress had brought evidence in writing of violations of 3 U.S. Code § 15 (d) (2) (B) (ii) (I) & (II) "The electors of the State were not lawfully certified under a certificate of ascertainment of appointment of electors according to section 5(a)(1)." and "The vote of one or more electors has not been regularly given."

  • Electors being you and me with the right to vote.

  • In other words Congress had evidence of the people's voting rights were violated and they chose to suppress that evidence and violate the people's rights further, committing treason against the people.

  • 3 U.S. Code § 15 - Counting electoral votes in Congress

(d)Procedure at Joint Session Generally.—

(2)Action on certificate.—

(B)Requirements for objections or questions.—

(i)Objections.—No objection or other question arising in the matter shall be in order unless the objection or question—

(I)is made in writing;

(II)is signed by at least one-fifth of the Senators duly chosen and sworn and one-fifth of the Members of the House of Representatives duly chosen and sworn; and

(III)in the case of an objection, states clearly and concisely, without argument, one of the grounds listed under clause (ii).

(ii)Grounds for objections.—The only grounds for objections shall be as follows:

(I)The electors of the State were not lawfully certified under a certificate of ascertainment of appointment of electors according to section 5(a)(1).

(II)The vote of one or more electors has not been regularly given.

(C)Consideration of objections and questions.—

(i)In general.—

When all objections so made to any vote or paper from a State, or other question arising in the matter, shall have been received and read, the Senate shall thereupon withdraw, and such objections and questions shall be submitted to the Senate for its decision; and the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall, in like manner, submit such objections and questions to the House of Representatives for its decision.

(ii)Determination.—

No objection or any other question arising in the matter may be sustained unless such objection or question is sustained by separate concurring votes of each House.

(D)Reconvening.—

When the two Houses have voted, they shall immediately again meet, and the presiding officer shall then announce the decision of the questions submitted. No vote or paper from any other State shall be acted upon until the objections previously made to any vote or paper from any State, and other questions arising in the matter, shall have been finally disposed of.