Yeah, well that was kind of the American project from the beginning. Liberalism itself is fine in an appropriate social context, such as what existed in those times.
As I mentioned, our opponents reject classical liberalism and Judge Nap.'s natural rights theory outright. In fact, they hate those ideas and resent you for holding them. Spend some time talking to progressives to confirm.
This is the outcome of the legal positivism as described in Judge Nap.'s lecture. People who believe the only rights which exist are those granted by text of law will feel justified in petitioning for 'rights'. That precedent has already been established, recently by the blatantly unequal enforcement of laws though it's been bubbling up from the bottom for many decades.
Yeah, well that was kind of the American project from the beginning. Liberalism itself is fine in an appropriate social context, such as what existed in those times.
https://raccoons.space/illustration/john-adams-constitution-religious-moral-meme.O4xRUN
As I mentioned, our opponents reject classical liberalism and Judge Nap.'s natural rights theory outright. In fact, they hate those ideas and resent you for holding them. Spend some time talking to progressives to confirm.
https://raccoons.space/illustration/we-are-going-to-exterminate-white-poeple-kamau-kambon-cspan-screenshot.O4xaLL
This is the outcome of the legal positivism as described in Judge Nap.'s lecture. People who believe the only rights which exist are those granted by text of law will feel justified in petitioning for 'rights'. That precedent has already been established, recently by the blatantly unequal enforcement of laws though it's been bubbling up from the bottom for many decades.