Bc they want to add lgbtq stuff and remove voter id, why change something that has worked for us for over 100 years? And all brought into play by out of state money.,,, vote no ,!
Unfortunately there are many more NO signs compared to yes. Either people are confused thinking No means they are against or so many cling to unlimited abortion, pedophilia and prostitution.
WTF are you talking about? Ohio does not have unlimited abortion, pedophia and prostitution?. The new bill , issue 1,, wants to add special things for lgbtq and make it harder to change things we can do now, why else would all of the sudden this be a issue after over 100 years? All being done with out of state money!!!
No, not voting yes makes it easier for Planned Parenthood and the Dems to more easily enact their plans: abortion up to term, pedophilia, circumventing parental rights, etc. Voting yes would have required 60% majority and 5% of voters from 88 counties instead of 44. The Republicans did a horrible, weak job of explaining the difference between the yes and no votes. However, I suspect the results were determined for us with another steal.
No, not voting yes doesn't make it easier, bc we only need to vote no with 50% Plus one . Imagine having to get 60% pulse 5% of each county,to say no to planned parenthood! Don't hafta jump through hoops to say no to these people , been working for over 100 years. Also did you see the add ons? Abortion up to 26 weeks packed away nice and tidy in the bill , then you would have to get 60% plus 5% of each county to get it back to what we have now .
The left wants you to vote yes, why all of the sudden do they want to fix something that has been working , there is other trash riding in this boat too... Vote no!!!
Your wrong , the left and Rino's are pushing this , they are adding lgbtq shit to it also , again why all of the sudden do they want to fix what has been working for 100 years? Simple majority has worked for Ohio over 100 years. All out of state money and they are wanting to change the abortion laws, and the Republicans that are pushing this won their seats from jerrymandering and now have new overlords to appease.
As adamant as you are about telling people to vote no, could your provide your sources for why a no vote is necessary - including the lbgt language that you say is present? Because as far as I can tell, there isn't anything of the sort present, rather, this is what the issue is about, taken directly from the documentation itself:
The proposed amendment would:
• Require that any proposed amendment to the Constitution of the State of Ohio receive the approval of at least 60 percent of eligible voters voting on the proposed amendment.
• Require that any initiative petition filed on or after January 1, 2024 with the Secretary of State proposing to amend the Constitution of the State of Ohio be signed by at least five percent of the electors of each county based on the total vote in the county for governor in the last preceding election.
• Specify that additional signatures may not be added to an initiative petition proposing to amend the Constitution of the State of Ohio that is filed with the Secretary of State on or after January 1, 2024 proposing to amend the Constitution of the State of Ohio.
In Ohio we are pretty much conservative, issue one will allow other forms of id,, illegals are here too. Issue one makes it more difficult to change our constitution, we would need a 60% threshold, plus we lose the 10 days to get extra votes for a issue if requested. Larosa is crying about keeping out of state money out of our politics, but why, what's in it for him all of the sudden and BTW this issue one was pushed by out of state money. I was wrong about the lgbtq stuff being in the bill, (there was talk of it) but I didn't see it, so on that point I was wrong ,. Looks like we won with no on issiu 1.why fix what is not broken. Proponents of issue one (yes vote) claimed it will make it harder to change Ohio's constitution but in reality it makes it harder on the voters to change things . Also now the abortion issue, we have a 6 week policy after 6 weeks no abortion . They would have changed it to 26 weeks. And that was packed in the bill.So imagine having to get 60 %. To get it back the way it is. A win for Ohio!
No, we aren't. There are plenty of conservative areas, but Cincinnati, Columbus, and Cleveland are pretty deep blue, and despite most of the state being red, they're the reason Ohio has a history as a swing state, and why, up until recently, we were purple.
This was not a win for Ohio; it's not a loss yet, but the point was to make it harder to allow for constitutional amendments because special interests want to change our constitution for anti-voter id and pro-abortion agendas, and so on. There's a reason the push for this was so skewed and intentionally confused.
When it comes time to vote on those measures, people are going to need to pay more attention and do more research than they did today.
Your ass backwards, special interest groups were pushing this bill with out of state money, like I said they wanted to change voter ID , why?? So illegals can vote?? You need to get some data about what else was in the bill.Im not that savvy to be much help. And why now out of the blue would they want to change things up 🤔 the vast majority has spoken! And have you seen the news tonight oan , real Americas voice, Steve Bannon , all praising Ohio , CNN crying about not getting their way. Who's side are you on anyway? Let's not forget , Google and msm only let you see what they want you to see.
It’s bad everywhere. Not a good sign. Supposedly it’s about tied with polling
Bc they want to add lgbtq stuff and remove voter id, why change something that has worked for us for over 100 years? And all brought into play by out of state money.,,, vote no ,!
Unfortunately there are many more NO signs compared to yes. Either people are confused thinking No means they are against or so many cling to unlimited abortion, pedophilia and prostitution.
WTF are you talking about? Ohio does not have unlimited abortion, pedophia and prostitution?. The new bill , issue 1,, wants to add special things for lgbtq and make it harder to change things we can do now, why else would all of the sudden this be a issue after over 100 years? All being done with out of state money!!!
Your confused.
No, not voting yes makes it easier for Planned Parenthood and the Dems to more easily enact their plans: abortion up to term, pedophilia, circumventing parental rights, etc. Voting yes would have required 60% majority and 5% of voters from 88 counties instead of 44. The Republicans did a horrible, weak job of explaining the difference between the yes and no votes. However, I suspect the results were determined for us with another steal.
No, not voting yes doesn't make it easier, bc we only need to vote no with 50% Plus one . Imagine having to get 60% pulse 5% of each county,to say no to planned parenthood! Don't hafta jump through hoops to say no to these people , been working for over 100 years. Also did you see the add ons? Abortion up to 26 weeks packed away nice and tidy in the bill , then you would have to get 60% plus 5% of each county to get it back to what we have now .
The left wants you to vote yes, why all of the sudden do they want to fix something that has been working , there is other trash riding in this boat too... Vote no!!!
left wants you to vote no retard. which is why it's confusing and the left will win on this
Your confused.
Your wrong , the left and Rino's are pushing this , they are adding lgbtq shit to it also , again why all of the sudden do they want to fix what has been working for 100 years? Simple majority has worked for Ohio over 100 years. All out of state money and they are wanting to change the abortion laws, and the Republicans that are pushing this won their seats from jerrymandering and now have new overlords to appease.
As adamant as you are about telling people to vote no, could your provide your sources for why a no vote is necessary - including the lbgt language that you say is present? Because as far as I can tell, there isn't anything of the sort present, rather, this is what the issue is about, taken directly from the documentation itself:
The proposed amendment would:
• Require that any proposed amendment to the Constitution of the State of Ohio receive the approval of at least 60 percent of eligible voters voting on the proposed amendment.
• Require that any initiative petition filed on or after January 1, 2024 with the Secretary of State proposing to amend the Constitution of the State of Ohio be signed by at least five percent of the electors of each county based on the total vote in the county for governor in the last preceding election.
• Specify that additional signatures may not be added to an initiative petition proposing to amend the Constitution of the State of Ohio that is filed with the Secretary of State on or after January 1, 2024 proposing to amend the Constitution of the State of Ohio.
https://www.ohiosos.gov/globalassets/elections/2023/spec/issuereport.pdf
Is there some pork that's being missed in the full letter of the amendment? If so, then why is General Flynn telling people to vote yes?
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/gen-michael-flynn-calls-on-ohio-voters-to-protect-the-unborn-during-rosary-rally-speech/
In Ohio we are pretty much conservative, issue one will allow other forms of id,, illegals are here too. Issue one makes it more difficult to change our constitution, we would need a 60% threshold, plus we lose the 10 days to get extra votes for a issue if requested. Larosa is crying about keeping out of state money out of our politics, but why, what's in it for him all of the sudden and BTW this issue one was pushed by out of state money. I was wrong about the lgbtq stuff being in the bill, (there was talk of it) but I didn't see it, so on that point I was wrong ,. Looks like we won with no on issiu 1.why fix what is not broken. Proponents of issue one (yes vote) claimed it will make it harder to change Ohio's constitution but in reality it makes it harder on the voters to change things . Also now the abortion issue, we have a 6 week policy after 6 weeks no abortion . They would have changed it to 26 weeks. And that was packed in the bill.So imagine having to get 60 %. To get it back the way it is. A win for Ohio!
No, we aren't. There are plenty of conservative areas, but Cincinnati, Columbus, and Cleveland are pretty deep blue, and despite most of the state being red, they're the reason Ohio has a history as a swing state, and why, up until recently, we were purple.
This was not a win for Ohio; it's not a loss yet, but the point was to make it harder to allow for constitutional amendments because special interests want to change our constitution for anti-voter id and pro-abortion agendas, and so on. There's a reason the push for this was so skewed and intentionally confused.
When it comes time to vote on those measures, people are going to need to pay more attention and do more research than they did today.
Your ass backwards, special interest groups were pushing this bill with out of state money, like I said they wanted to change voter ID , why?? So illegals can vote?? You need to get some data about what else was in the bill.Im not that savvy to be much help. And why now out of the blue would they want to change things up 🤔 the vast majority has spoken! And have you seen the news tonight oan , real Americas voice, Steve Bannon , all praising Ohio , CNN crying about not getting their way. Who's side are you on anyway? Let's not forget , Google and msm only let you see what they want you to see.
Vote with the leftoids then dude haha