Did you notice? In May, our Director of the CIA made a secret trip to China to meet with Xi. Then in June our Secretary of State traveled to China. Then in July, our Secretary of the Treasury visited. Now, I’m no genius, but this is hard not to notice, and plainly something is up.
May I proffer an explanation?
In carrying out the theft of the 2020 election, the Democratic Machine and Deep State were marching according to orders. And the orders weren’t to merely to cheat. They were to win by any means. And that has created the prospect of turbulence and peril for all of us. Let me explain.
To guarantee victory, you simply must include closed-loop interference methods in your arsenal. Because open-loop methods can’t guarantee victory. You stuffed 100,000 ballots into drop boxes in Georgia? Great, does that mean Biden will win? No idea. Because methods that involve stuffing the ballot box without any view into the electoral count can’t guarantee victory. That’s why you need to use closed-loop methods as well.
Now here’s the problem: closed-loop methods leave definitive digital evidence. And it is about to come out.
It is unthinkable that the digital portion of the theft was conducted from within the United States. That would be clinically insane. Here’s what we did: we erected another instance of Hammer and Scorecard that was executing on machines outside of the United States. And we recruited Chinese operatives to operate this secondary instance. This was the final “get out of jail free card.” Should it ever come to pass that the digital evidence comes to light, the evidence will point to China. And the Democratic Machine and Deep State will cry: “Oh my God, our election systems were hacked! China did it! We had no idea!”
Well, the testimony and the digital evidence concerning the theft is about to be presented in Lindell’s case in Colorado. (Dennis Montgomery has been ordered to comply with a subpoena for his testimony in that case. Production of an order for his testimony from a federal court was an outcome agreed upon by Lindell and Montgomery to provide maximum security for Montgomery.) And when the evidence comes to light, our relationship with China will become “bumpy.”
So the Biden Administration got ahead of the situation. Burns (Director of CIA) updated Xi on the status of matters and advised him that the digital evidence appears likely to surface. They may have discussed options. Perhaps Montgomery has an untimely death. Or perhaps $1B of dark money finds its way to him, to secure testimony from him to the effect that Hammer and Scorecard was a big hoax all along. And so on. But, at the end of the day, Xi needed to know the waters were going to get bumpy.
But there was more. In exchange for holding the bloody murder weapon for the Deep State, the Deep State was prepared to permit China to use the Hammer and Scorecard system one more time.
Next comes Blinken’s role in all of this. Blinken rolls into China and tells Xi that we are willing to surrender Taiwan to China, but it has to look right. No military invasion. China can’t take it by force. But, if, say, in the 2024 Taiwanese presidential election the people of Taiwan were to “vote in” a national leader who was pro-unification, who would we be to stand in the way of democratic processes? And then Blinken returns to the United States and gives his carefully worded press briefing about his trip. Wherein he told the press: (1) I informed President Xi that it is the position of the United States that, as it stands right now, Taiwan and China are separate countries; (2) but the United States is not insistent that these countries remain separate; and (3) the United States only insists that this state of affairs not be changed by forceful unilateral action.
Finally, it’s Yellen’s turn. She travels to China to ensure that our supply chain of semiconductors wouldn't get interrupted in the immediate wake of unification. Our domestic fabrication facilities aren’t online yet and won’t be for a while. So we’ll need semiconductors from Taiwan.
All eyes on the Taiwanese presidential election, folks. Hammer and Scorecard are getting a workout one more time.
Is any of this certain? No. It’s just my speculation.
Oh -- you raise a good point here.
I've mentioned that I have a twin brother. For safety's sake, I'll not say more about him.
That said, a few weeks ago I was telling him that I was very tempted to show up at the deposition of Montgomery. Undoubtedly the DOJ and FBI will be there. For those who may not know, a deposition is considered to be the same as testimony in court -- generally speaking the public is able to attend. NO ONE ever attends a deposition, and the Feds would be pissed! And I'd be able to provide first-hand reportage.
Do it! We are the news now.
I'm so tempted.
It actually sounds like fun!
Don't tempt me!
Excellent! But I meant too, if the meetings with Biden’s cabinet were spied upon.
If you are able you should. Your motive would be for truth to be magnified. So yes you should go. Whatever is good- focus on this. It’s not just about our thoughts but our actions too.