Ars Technica is a site with some interesting history. Currently its readership and staff have acute cases of TDS. Snowden used to be a regular poster there. Infamous pedophile Peter Bright (Dr. Pizza) was also an infamous poster and contributor there. It's a Conde Nast property now.
I'll be keeping an eye on how GORDON PEDERSEN/Gordon Pedersen does with this defense.
EDIT: Oh shit and let me tie this into Q, and apologies for burying what could have been the lede:
I think this is well worth watching for the anon interested in sovereign citizen/US corporation/court legitimacy topics.
The guy has money and the willingness to file some of the arguments we see floated in only a theoretical sense.
Here are his products:
https://www.amazon.com/stores/page/91BE0F4B-B0E1-4B3C-AC37-45DC5575DC19?ingress=0&visitId=0533e601-954e-46ca-acdb-2efcb2327647&ref_=ast_bln
Some of the court documents he's filed:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.120963/gov.uscourts.utd.120963.14.0.pdf
Here are the charges:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.120963/gov.uscourts.utd.120963.1.0.pdf
Ars Technica is a site with some interesting history. Currently its readership and staff have acute cases of TDS. Snowden used to be a regular poster there. Infamous pedophile Peter Bright (Dr. Pizza) was also an infamous poster and contributor there. It's a Conde Nast property now.
I'll be keeping an eye on how GORDON PEDERSEN/Gordon Pedersen does with this defense.
EDIT: Oh shit and let me tie this into Q, and apologies for burying what could have been the lede:
John Huber is the US Attorney for the case.
https://anontools.xyz/?text=huber&adv=true&whole=true&refs=false
u/#q2973
Why is John Huber doing this small-fry, silver supplement FDA case??
Full name is Gordon Hunter Pedersen
If they lose this, they lose everything.
Which John Huber?
My guess is this one:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_W._Huber
In the charges it actually appears to list some sort of attorney license number?
#7226
Weird, it says John W. Huber retired in 2021...
https://www.justice.gov/usao-ut/pr/john-huber-leaves-his-post-longest-serving-united-states-attorney-nation
Maybe he could still be on the paperwork because the case began before he left?
"...America’s longest currently serving U.S. Attorney is moving on..."
Tangent: 7+2+2+6 = 17
That was my thought: weird. Perhaps a "U.S. Attorney" as in an attorney for the Corporation, cannot prosecute a sovereign citizen? Just a thought..