I know there is Q and Anons - I'm not the author of that headline
The important thing, it seems, is to keep alive the potency of the original narrative, and keep it connected to the day’s events. Conspiracists now use old Q posts like Nostradamus’s prophecies, reinterpreting gibberish in light of new events to retroactively claim there’s been a plan all along. The YouTube videos and podcasters who accrue social capital around QAnon these days do so by interpreting the evidence of the day as proof that the plan is working.
Gibberish hey. I just smell fear.
Colin Dickey wrote the hit piece. It would be a shame if bad reviews were left on Amazon for hsi latest book:
I know there is Q and Anons - I'm not the author of that headline
The important thing, it seems, is to keep alive the potency of the original narrative, and keep it connected to the day’s events. Conspiracists now use old Q posts like Nostradamus’s prophecies, reinterpreting gibberish in light of new events to retroactively claim there’s been a plan all along. The YouTube videos and podcasters who accrue social capital around QAnon these days do so by interpreting the evidence of the day as proof that the plan is working.
Gibberish hey. I just smell fear.
Colin Dickey wrote the hit piece. It would be a shame if bad reviews were left on Amazon for hsi latest book:
https://www.amazon.com/Under-Eye-Power-Societies-Democracy/dp/0593299450/ref=sr_1_1?crid=39252KJ0NZUUA&keywords=Colin+dickey&qid=1692602828&sprefix=colin+dicke%2Caps%2C1290&sr=8-1