Larry Hogan 'disgusted' Republican candidates pledged to support Trump if convicted at debate - Six of eight did, Christie & "Ada" didn't. - The Great Awakening

Larry Hogan 'disgusted' Republican candidates pledged to support Trump if convicted at debate - Six of eight did, Christie & "Ada" didn't. (www.washingtonexaminer.com)

posted 1 year ago by AmberWins 1 year ago by AmberWins +7 / -0

Larry Hogan 'disgusted' Republican candidates pledged to support Trump if convicted at debate

Former Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan said he is disappointed that six of the eight presidential candidates at the Republican debate pledged to support former President Donald Trump if he is convicted in one or more of his criminal cases.

6 comments

6 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (6)

sorted by:

▲ 4 ▼

– RetiredWarrior 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Christie raised his hand too, it's after Pence.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– AmberWins [S] 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Really? I guess the writer didn't see that. Funny that Asa Hutchinson didn't. And Trump referred to him as "Ada" for some reason with Tucker.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 4 ▼

– RetiredWarrior 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

I went back and watched it twice. Christie seemed reluctant, but raised his hand after Pence and DeSantis looked around and raised their hands.

I caught the Ada comment too. It piqued my interest because he always has a reason to give people new names even if we don't understand why right away.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q