I just happened to see this new post from anon u/Robertkolodin about the possible negation of the most recent - and perhaps most ridiculous - indictment against President Trump and the others…
https://greatawakening.win/p/16c2RZ6wPR/georgia-indictments-are-done-bef/
That got me thinking that a potential strategy would be to have two of the other indictments whittled away and dismissed, one after the other. What this would (or at least might) do is to whip up the frenzy in the FNM as they screech about how “Trump is getting away with his crimes!!”, whipping their dwindling viewer base into a veritable frenzy (think of a pack of starving jackals locked in a cage with a glass-enclosed huge hunk of raw meat if you need a visual😏). Each dismissal would ramp up the level of frenzy coming from the demonic FNM talking heads, the sense of panic, the level of vitriol.
Now, what this would do is get everyone from the confused, vacuous, blue-haired, brainwashed progressive drones who are terrified of the mean orange man, to the die-hard, belligerent, brainwashed democrats who somehow think the Potatus gives a crap about them to the independents and moderate-to-rabid anti-Trump RINOs - in addition to the vast majority, the MAGA patriots - a whole lot of really strong desire to watch this trial. It would definitely be the trial of the century. Isn’t that exactly what the WH want? ALL eyes on the trial. ALL eyes seeing the disclosures taking place for themselves.
If you have one indictment and it fizzles out, then FNM can carp and grouse and slander, but if you have FOUR indictments then three then two then only one that actually takes the issue to trial, you’ve ramped up the interest to a crescendo.
Anyway, it’s just a theory on a possible strategy. Thoughts?
Sounds logical to me. Distilling all the narrative down to one pivotal case. Tee up Perry Mason. Cue the Q.