And the leading edge of aircraft are very thin 40 or 50 thousandths. As a structural aircraft mechanic I have no problem believing the plans did the damage shown.
And I also belive the govt was responsible for 9/11.
Absolutely, although our government is like twins. There is the good one (half) and the bad one (half...aka Deep State). Bushes were in cahoots with the Bin Ladens. The terrorist task force just moved into the floor where the plane crashed just the week prior and all info was destroyed. The missing money that was questioned was forgotten about. And it goes on and on and on.
Great example of how fragile those wings are!!
Wings get much thinner the farther out you go.
And the leading edge of aircraft are very thin 40 or 50 thousandths. As a structural aircraft mechanic I have no problem believing the plans did the damage shown.
And I also belive the govt was responsible for 9/11.
Absolutely, although our government is like twins. There is the good one (half) and the bad one (half...aka Deep State). Bushes were in cahoots with the Bin Ladens. The terrorist task force just moved into the floor where the plane crashed just the week prior and all info was destroyed. The missing money that was questioned was forgotten about. And it goes on and on and on.
40 thou thick? The only a/c I have seen like that is the F-104, certainly not a widebody, they are high chord wings.
Leading edge only. The curved part that's connected to the top and lower spar cord.
No slats then. Are you really an aircraft mech? What's a spar cord?