History Channel - Airborne Laser
(twitter.com)
Comments (8)
sorted by:
This makes much more sense than space weapons.
actually space borne directed energy weapons have easier design envelopes than airborne. The beam energy from space doesn't need to be as intense to produce the equivalent destruction. far less atmospheric interference (typically far less than 28 atmospheric miles to target). yes, they have more than one in orbit. yes the beams co-focus. yes the beams are outside the visible spectrum. plus other sneaky stuff you never thought of...psst... SFL harmonic inter-modulation. they're decades beyond your comprehension. wakey wakey time. the real stuff doesn't get patented.
It's pretty easy to hit the ground either way....
Just information a brain dead found. LOL
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MmkYcEcSLvA
Hey thanks for the info on shittube. I appreciate this. Now more people can look through this.
Real Genius.
Yes.