something is fishy...me thinks maybe they have a play in mind that will seek to invalidate Trump's EOs, PEADs or some other action based upon it being "unconstitutional" ? we don't care about the corporation's "constitution"
I don’t think that they want to set a precedent that states can declare an emergency and go against the federal government. Note that you can only be a sanctuary state when there is a Republican president.
They’re also pretty clear that the “federal” constitution can’t be suspended by States, but presumably the federal government can do it.
something is fishy...me thinks maybe they have a play in mind that will seek to invalidate Trump's EOs, PEADs or some other action based upon it being "unconstitutional" ? we don't care about the corporation's "constitution"
Bingo
I don’t think that they want to set a precedent that states can declare an emergency and go against the federal government. Note that you can only be a sanctuary state when there is a Republican president.
They’re also pretty clear that the “federal” constitution can’t be suspended by States, but presumably the federal government can do it.