the fire/fuel burning on the UPPER 1/3 or so of the the buildings would have had 0 impact on bringing down the structure below. absolutely zero.
WHERE DID THE REST OF THE BUILDING GO?
110 story building... not crushed... where did all of it go? how does a 110 story building "collapse" or "disintegrate" in 10 seconds?
WHY WAS THERE DUST.... BEFORE THE TOWERS WENT DOWN? (directed energy?)
in controlled demolitions for example, the building is exploded into chunks, hits the ground.... THEN, there is smoke. Watch the towers as they begin to fall.... why was there dust BEFORE they hit the ground?
and then we have Building 7..... that had no SEISMIC ACTIVITY equal to its apparent size HITTING the ground. this means, as we've all seen in videos, it was attacked & turned to dust effectively BEFORE hitting the ground. Even the piping under the ground was still in-tact after it was taken out.
"the planes" needed A LOT of help to bring those towers down. shaped charges, directed-energy weapons, defense systems given stand-downs, insurance policies taken out on the buildings, etc.
i was 10 years old when this happened. i remember the coverage that day & they stopped showing the towers falling. perhaps they caught on that people would have started questioning the method(s) that were used to bring them down, contrary to what MSM was telling everybody??
Have you watched how they take down casinos in Vegas? Same kind of tall buildings with lots of rooms and exact same method of falling directly onto its foundation.
That's how those buildings (all 3 of them) went down. You have to pack a bunch of explosives on the ground floor to make it do all that.
As for the dust part, I didn't catch it. You got me thinking now.
the fire/fuel burning on the UPPER 1/3 or so of the the buildings would have had 0 impact on bringing down the structure below. absolutely zero.
WHERE DID THE REST OF THE BUILDING GO?
110 story building... not crushed... where did all of it go? how does a 110 story building "collapse" or "disintegrate" in 10 seconds?
WHY WAS THERE DUST.... BEFORE THE TOWERS WENT DOWN? (directed energy?)
in controlled demolitions for example, the building is exploded into chunks, hits the ground.... THEN, there is smoke. Watch the towers as they begin to fall.... why was there dust BEFORE they hit the ground?
and then we have Building 7..... that had no SEISMIC ACTIVITY equal to its apparent size HITTING the ground. this means, as we've all seen in videos, it was attacked & turned to dust effectively BEFORE hitting the ground. Even the piping under the ground was still in-tact after it was taken out.
"the planes" needed A LOT of help to bring those towers down. shaped charges, directed-energy weapons, defense systems given stand-downs, insurance policies taken out on the buildings, etc.
i was 10 years old when this happened. i remember the coverage that day & they stopped showing the towers falling. perhaps they caught on that people would have started questioning the method(s) that were used to bring them down, contrary to what MSM was telling everybody??
No planes needed....
Have you watched how they take down casinos in Vegas? Same kind of tall buildings with lots of rooms and exact same method of falling directly onto its foundation.
That's how those buildings (all 3 of them) went down. You have to pack a bunch of explosives on the ground floor to make it do all that.
As for the dust part, I didn't catch it. You got me thinking now.