It took a long time for WTC7 to collapse and it resulted from an internal fire that consumed the non-structural elements of the building and weakened the steel far below its margins of safety. Carbonaceous fuels are easily hot enough to melt steel (what do you suppose we use for blast furnaces?). Nuclear sources are simple loony fantasy.
“ Carbonaceous fuels “ that’s a new one to add to the pile of revisionist bullshit.
You realize wtc 7 was not hit by a plane did not have hydrocarbons and the “office fires” were consuming standard office equipment (desks, chairs, carpets, paper, etc).
It had building materials. No building is all steel and glass. Desks, chairs, carpets, paper, etc., are all carbonaceous (carbon-containing) fuels---which is why I did not say "hydrocarbons.". You don't have to get close to the melting point before structural steel loses nearly all its strength.
I did take a peek, but the conclusive videos at the opening page were nothing of the sort. And the quotations from the principals was an immediate flag of prejudice animating their approach.
It took a long time for WTC7 to collapse and it resulted from an internal fire that consumed the non-structural elements of the building and weakened the steel far below its margins of safety. Carbonaceous fuels are easily hot enough to melt steel (what do you suppose we use for blast furnaces?). Nuclear sources are simple loony fantasy.
“ Carbonaceous fuels “ that’s a new one to add to the pile of revisionist bullshit.
You realize wtc 7 was not hit by a plane did not have hydrocarbons and the “office fires” were consuming standard office equipment (desks, chairs, carpets, paper, etc).
It had building materials. No building is all steel and glass. Desks, chairs, carpets, paper, etc., are all carbonaceous (carbon-containing) fuels---which is why I did not say "hydrocarbons.". You don't have to get close to the melting point before structural steel loses nearly all its strength.
If you are honestly interested this is a site with factual information.
https://www.ae911truth.org/
I did take a peek, but the conclusive videos at the opening page were nothing of the sort. And the quotations from the principals was an immediate flag of prejudice animating their approach.