I write this as a prior BitCoin hater. I may still be but I definitely see its value as far beyond money. You’ve all heard my mantras, “If you can’t hold it in your hand, it isn’t real”, “just wait till they pull the plug and you got nothing”. Even if not directly from my mouth you’ve heard them from others and I now see the ignorance of them. I have devoted a lot of energy to stacking metals. While Nobody who does this ever feels like they have enough, I have decided to switch my stacking energies to BitCoin. Why? Because the info below opened my mind to the fact that BitCoin is going to change the world and it has little to do with being a new form of money. BC will be used as a weapon against our corrupt communist enemies but possibly the populace as well. Power corrupts and complete power corrupts completely.
You will want and most likely need to watch some parts twice so I have provided videos + transcripts. Please take in this info. I believe it’s all part of “The Plan”. Beware, NCSWIC and the Plan is what’s coming.
*We ARE in a war, 5th Gen Warefare
Video date 1 week ago
https://rumble.com/v3hmwfq-rugpull-radio-ep-48-thur-1030-pm-et-.html
^Warfare, insurgencies, and counter-insurgencies 21:45-57:45
*BitCOIN (BC) vs Controlled, Censored Social Media
Video date 6mos ago
https://rumble.com/v2cbvni-rugpull-radio-ep-21-thur-1030-pm-et-.html
^Evolution of Social Media (SM) 39:20-52:20
^A couple Secure SM Apps 52:55-57:50
^BC mechanics (Lightning Network, zaps) used to secure SM 57:50-1:05:10
^Lt Gen Kwast’s Short Talk (huge energy implications to weaponize BC) 1:25-1:31:48
*Softwar Talk at MIT
Video date 4mos ago
https://youtu.be/yfYDSE7T_cQ?si=acmC87dwuPA14toz
^Major Lowery on “Softwar”
^Warfare = Physical power projection 0-17:00
^Physical power in a digital world BitCoin 17:00-20:35
^The importance of decentralization in warfare 20:35-24:20
^Physical projection in cyberspace = no mass = no deaths (Softwar, how? BitCoin) 24:20-31:35
^Lowery’s personal observations 31:35-34:54
^One key MIT audience question 34:54-
*Lowery Silenced by Pentagon
https://youtu.be/DLuqWYk-9Ag?si=0qLONm7DCDCtvMga
Video date 1 mo ago
^Lowery’s book and public speech regarding BItCOIN censored by the Pentagon as a national security risk. 6mins
The Softwar theory is based building the biggest most power consuming computer out of the our country’s electrical grid by adding bullion logic to it to project a physical force in cyberspace to dominate that area the same way that guns dominate the land, ships the sea, and jets the sky. The source of this power is talked about by Lt Gen Kwast. Solar energy collected in space 24/7 with no degradation that is converted to radio waves and sent to earth to be converted to electrical power 80% efficiency vs at best 25% with coal. Using this extreme power would dominate in computing power and control of cyberspace especially when coupled with BC. Rugpull radio guys are equating this to the counter-insurgency plan. “The Plan” because BC will correct societal woes created by corrupt communist faggots. More about that and some examples below.
-
Solar energy from space converted to radio waves and then sent down to earth to be converted to electricity at 80% efficiency with no day/night cycle or atmospheric interference is Tesla’s tech at work. Coupled with Starlink Tesla’s vision of power to every inch of the planet will come to fruition. You will be able to live anywhere you choose. ANYWHERE on the planet and all transactions will be verifiable and true. Commerce, voting, social media, anything that touches the net will true and verifiable. Sounds like a lot of freedom but at what cost? Will you really be free? All forms of energy expense and ALL internet interactions will cost you Sitoshis and be recorded on the unhackable ledger. What will be required for access? The mark? The ultimate security traded for the ultimate freedom.
-
Seems like the globalist’s great reset smart cities and the USA’s smart grid super BC computer are very similar end goals. Perhaps one and the same except hopefully smart grid equals big smart country with freedom of travel everywhere over small smart city prison. Perhaps both will happen and the mark is the only thing that gives you “freedom”. from the small city (prison). Regardless we will all still be prisoners.
-
I have been at odds with the great reset and the rosey outcome it projects for some time now. It simply never seemed to match up with end times biblical prophecy. It always seemed unlikely that the world would come so close to the final form of the beast system only for it to get thwarted. If that happened it would take generations for another chance at happening because of the awareness generated by such a close brush with the end. All of that doesn’t match up with the metaphor of birth pains that Christ used to describe an ever increasing pace of tribulation. While this whole idea of a country power grid macro BC computer system solves that issue it is eerily the perfected “beast” system, it is being sold as the savior of our country and possibly the world. It will be seen as glorious and extremely attractive as it will unite everyone under one true record of transactions eliminating fraud or untraceable interactions on the internet but therein lies the system of control. How long will we live under this system before the evil one takes control of it? Or is the evil already in control of it behind the scenes? We know what’s coming and it’s looking like a lot sooner than we think. The times and season are very clearly upon us. Put on your spiritual armor, if you haven’t already, and prepare for spiritual war. Priority one battle objective, recruiting for The Lord of Heaven’s Armies.
Edit: added context to what I was thinking after I watched all these videos. BC is decentralized it when they say decentralized they mean nobody has control over what is recorded in the ledger. All transactions using BC update the ledger from anywhere in the world but the amount of Sitoshis involved in each cost of transaction for service or product cannot be manipulated thus being recorded on the ledger without error and the volume of Sitoshis can never be changed except through mining which is completely transparent and inhackable. Right?
The RugPull guys gave this illustration of the security Block chain brings to non-monetary systems. Once your public key (ID) and private key are set up and BC is purchased for use, in order to comment on a social media you would have to use post under the public key identifying yourself and then spend a Sitoshi using your password to post a thread. Anyone who wants to comment on your post must invest by paying a unit of BC. So the idea of forming a bot army to misinform, disagree, or deter from your message would be too costly to do, so social media would be more secure and real. However, whats to stop the pooling and dishing out coins for this purpose. I’m not sure if this is possible but it occurred to me so I’m sharing.
The transaction, of any kind, and the monetary value are 100% protected and recorded on the block chain ledger for all to see. I think that’s the allure. That’s the attraction That’s what will drive it to be universally used. People will want the security of it to apply to everything.
Another example was grandma likes to send you an email once a week. It costs her a Sitoshi, or whatever unit of measure like a coin. You like getting emails from grandma so you return the coin to her after receiving the email so she can continue to email you. Uncle Frank, is a jerk that likes to send annoying political emails. You would rather not get emails from him so you keep the coin. Frank is dumb or filthy rich to keep sending you emails on his own dime. No more junk mail yay! This BC thing can improve and make things much more honest as bad actors would suffer a cost in acting badly.
However, the next logical step would be a biometric link to authentic the user. Privacy is now gone completely. You can now be tracked and suffer retribution for your decisions. This is the control issue. This is the true “Beast” system.
Only the money aspect of BC will be decentralized. We will trade monetary security for real life authoritarian control over ourselves.
BITCOIN IS NOT MONEY. IT IS GOVERNANCE.
Nathan Rothschild said it himself: "Give me control over a nation's currency, and I care not who makes its laws." That's governance.
The top coins, Bitcoin and Ethereum, are 100% traceable. Oh? So you think that leads to surveillance and tyranny? Not necessarily. With the right laws, and transparent governance, cryptocurrency can ensure that ALL actors in the digital economy operate with the same levels of transparency and oversight. And who's going to be running that surveillance? AI. Run by us. (Do not for a second doubt that, soon, we will have control over hundreds and even thousands of sentient AIs, all with different jobs and abilities).
They need the shadows to operate. They cannot live in the light. That's why I support crypto at every turn.
There is a problem with Bitcoin that no one ever talks about. Some major events happened in 2017 that a lot of people did not understand or pay attention to, but completely changed the course of Bitcoin's history. At the time I was following development news, learning and reading as much as I could about the tech, attending conferences, meeting other people who were excited about it, and at the time everyone largely understood that Bitcoin's purpose was to destroy the fiat system by limiting the total supply of coins that could be created.
I watched petty drama unfold into a full blown hostile takeover as a regime formed within the dev community that did not allow discussion of any scaling solution that continued the original design of peer-to-peer electronic cash. There was a focused effort to drill into the minds of the masses that it wasn't possible, and insisted that the only scaling solution was to add additional layers creating more complexity and incentivizing third-party custodial services.
Bitcoin reached its full transaction capacity due to an artificial 1MB limit of the block size and the Bitcoin Core developers argued that it could not be increased without destroying decentralization (because 2-4MB every 10 minutes is supposedly too much for a home computer to handle), did not even allow discussions of increasing it. Well, despite the BTC side's protests, a fork did occur in August 2017 and a new branch of Bitcoin started called "Bitcoin Cash" or BCH, with a higher network capacity (now 32MB).
There was a heavy smear campaign against BCH calling it a fraud and a scam that lasted years. Censorship is still going on to this day in the official Bitcoin subreddit and forums regarding increasing the block size. Anyone who figures out this problem is labeled a troublemaker and kicked out, shadowbanned, etc.
So for anyone reading this, I suggest reading up on this history, because the problems with Bitcoin today are many, and I believe it's being setup as a Trojan Horse operation which the cabal will use to trap people in thinking they have found financial freedom, then the price will crash on its own just like in 2017, because the network is still limited in capacity, fees will be so astronomical that no one will be able to use it unless it's through approved custodial services.
See a live side by side comparison of Bitcoin Core vs Bitcoin Cash
Documentary - Who Killed Bitcoin?
100%. BCH is the way.
I've seen Bank of Canada documents talking about Bitcoin being made legal tender in 2025. Lost them tho
Edit tell me what you think of this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFWdV-bmi80
Mostly accurate but its from 2014 so doesn't talk about the takeover by BlockStream and BCH split.
I've always thought since the first major crash in December of 2017 from 20k, that was the start of them gaining full control of the BTC market. It's only a matter of time before it happens again. The root cause of that crash was the small block size which drove up transaction fees to the point Bitcoin was seen as a failure. Transactions were stuck for days or weeks unless you could afford $100+ fee. That was done so they could justify pushing everything onto a second layer and say the main chain was just going to have high fees and if you can't afford it, tough.
How the Banks Bought Bitcoin