The article you mention is fake. Period.
At best you have him casually mentioning that it had been debunked, that source is ABCs website. https://abcnews.go.com/International/analysts-identify-syriahoax-russian-fueled-propaganda/story?id=46787674
He didn't debunk it himself. He said, and I quote, "That hoax story was promoted by a network of Russian social media accounts and ultimately picked up by popular alt-right personalities in the United States, including Mike Cernovich, one of the leading voices in the debunked 'Pizzagate' conspiracy theory."
This topic is well meaning but ultimately misnamed and misinformed A better title would be "journalist at ABC who happened to havs supported the debunking of pizzagate gets 15 years for CP"
That is why the word debunked is in "quotations". It was meant as sarcasm. We all know the story is true, and was never debunked, but the MSM tried to tell the world that it had been.
I guess that slipped by you.
Instead of trying to cast dispersions on everybody else's posts, maybe you can try to look for the actual meaning in/of the posts first?
You should try researching before you post nonsense, additionally i posted research in my previous post: https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-abc-pizzagate-idUSL1N39W381
The article you mention is fake. Period. At best you have him casually mentioning that it had been debunked, that source is ABCs website. https://abcnews.go.com/International/analysts-identify-syriahoax-russian-fueled-propaganda/story?id=46787674 He didn't debunk it himself. He said, and I quote, "That hoax story was promoted by a network of Russian social media accounts and ultimately picked up by popular alt-right personalities in the United States, including Mike Cernovich, one of the leading voices in the debunked 'Pizzagate' conspiracy theory."
This topic is well meaning but ultimately misnamed and misinformed A better title would be "journalist at ABC who happened to havs supported the debunking of pizzagate gets 15 years for CP"
That is why the word debunked is in "quotations". It was meant as sarcasm. We all know the story is true, and was never debunked, but the MSM tried to tell the world that it had been. I guess that slipped by you. Instead of trying to cast dispersions on everybody else's posts, maybe you can try to look for the actual meaning in/of the posts first?
Cognative dissonance is a hell of a drug dude.