He went from at the very least Q agnostic to total Qtard? It annoys me a bit that he's so snarky towards skeptics when he was one not too long ago. It's one thing to be on board and another to be arrogant about it, as if you always were on board and other people are just too stupid to get it.
Is it just me? Maybe he's was always supposed to be a pied piper - but I don't know how effective this method is tbh. Thoughts?
Converts are always the most zealous, I guess. Plus, PDJT is the King of Snark.
I read his posts because he does excellent research and connects the dots, as a competent journalist should. As I recall, he didn't necessarily deny the accuracy of Q. He just didn't quote the information since it was an anonymous source, as a competent journalist should. My opinion was that he read the drops and used them to guide his research, which is what Q intended.
At this point, the evidence that Q is legit is indisputable to those who will see it. Newbies are certainly at a disadvantage because they missed all of the drops, proofs, and discussions in real time of the last six years. The reality is that there's no substitute or even a cheat sheet for that, as far as I know. The only way they can be convinced is to go through the same process we did, which is to read the Q drops, read posts here, and look for connections to events.