I 100% believe that Trump has been treated very unfairly. That is obvious.
But it's a bit difficult to agree with him on his idea that no other president has been treated as badly as he has been when President Lincoln and President Kennedy were both ASSASSINATED in office.
I've been here long enough to realize that some people get very upset whenever someone says something that might seem even the tiniest bit critical of President Trump. I don't expect this to be any different. I am curious to see what sort of argument they're going to make where being shot in the head and having your brains spray everywhere and dying is not as bad as what President Trump has endured.
Neither Lincoln nor Kennedy were innocent in their own rights. Lincoln took office for the purpose of going to war. He only represented half the country, and left many innocent unnecessarily dead on both sides.
Kennedy won by election rigging. He represented the corrupt interests that put him there. He may have tried to pivot, but in so doing betrayed his backers.
Trump won 100% fair and square. He entered with clean hands and has kept his hands clean this whole while. He has faithfully represented the interests of all of the American people.
What they’ve done to Trump is not as severe, but it’s infinitely less fair. There is no legitimate reason to attack Trump, and any opposition to him is a direct affront to the American people.
So they deserved to get assassinated? And that him being alive is worse than them being dead?
You really think that any opposition to him is a direct affront to the American people? That he shouldn't be doubted or questioned at all, ever, over anything?
I 100% believe that Trump has been treated very unfairly. That is obvious.
But it's a bit difficult to agree with him on his idea that no other president has been treated as badly as he has been when President Lincoln and President Kennedy were both ASSASSINATED in office.
I've been here long enough to realize that some people get very upset whenever someone says something that might seem even the tiniest bit critical of President Trump. I don't expect this to be any different. I am curious to see what sort of argument they're going to make where being shot in the head and having your brains spray everywhere and dying is not as bad as what President Trump has endured.
Neither Lincoln nor Kennedy were innocent in their own rights. Lincoln took office for the purpose of going to war. He only represented half the country, and left many innocent unnecessarily dead on both sides.
Kennedy won by election rigging. He represented the corrupt interests that put him there. He may have tried to pivot, but in so doing betrayed his backers.
Trump won 100% fair and square. He entered with clean hands and has kept his hands clean this whole while. He has faithfully represented the interests of all of the American people.
What they’ve done to Trump is not as severe, but it’s infinitely less fair. There is no legitimate reason to attack Trump, and any opposition to him is a direct affront to the American people.
So they deserved to get assassinated? And that him being alive is worse than them being dead?
You really think that any opposition to him is a direct affront to the American people? That he shouldn't be doubted or questioned at all, ever, over anything?