I 100% believe that Trump has been treated very unfairly. That is obvious.
But it's a bit difficult to agree with him on his idea that no other president has been treated as badly as he has been when President Lincoln and President Kennedy were both ASSASSINATED in office.
I've been here long enough to realize that some people get very upset whenever someone says something that might seem even the tiniest bit critical of President Trump. I don't expect this to be any different. I am curious to see what sort of argument they're going to make where being shot in the head and having your brains spray everywhere and dying is not as bad as what President Trump has endured.
The preemptive dismissal of disagreement supported by sophomoric argument is a well-known and recognizable DS tactic.
Just because the DS has not been successful in assassinating PDJT doesn't mean they haven't tried. We know they have, but we don't know about every attempt. It means that he has protection and has been able to out maneuver them at every turn, and they are now left with lawfare to try to defeat him.
Q drop readers know that this is the way to legally introduce evidence into the public record. We know that Trump isn't really whining about his unfair treatment, but he is a fan of the art of war. He's appearing weak while inserting LJ's own campaign promises into the court record. He's building the case against the DS while exposing them to the public.
I'm not saying there has been no attempt made to assassinate him.
I'm saying that those presidents who have actually been assassinated have had a worse go of it than President Trump who still lives and breathes and gets to love his family, be loved in return.
I 100% believe that Trump has been treated very unfairly. That is obvious.
But it's a bit difficult to agree with him on his idea that no other president has been treated as badly as he has been when President Lincoln and President Kennedy were both ASSASSINATED in office.
I've been here long enough to realize that some people get very upset whenever someone says something that might seem even the tiniest bit critical of President Trump. I don't expect this to be any different. I am curious to see what sort of argument they're going to make where being shot in the head and having your brains spray everywhere and dying is not as bad as what President Trump has endured.
The preemptive dismissal of disagreement supported by sophomoric argument is a well-known and recognizable DS tactic.
Just because the DS has not been successful in assassinating PDJT doesn't mean they haven't tried. We know they have, but we don't know about every attempt. It means that he has protection and has been able to out maneuver them at every turn, and they are now left with lawfare to try to defeat him.
Q drop readers know that this is the way to legally introduce evidence into the public record. We know that Trump isn't really whining about his unfair treatment, but he is a fan of the art of war. He's appearing weak while inserting LJ's own campaign promises into the court record. He's building the case against the DS while exposing them to the public.
Pay attention and see past the superficial.
I'm not saying there has been no attempt made to assassinate him.
I'm saying that those presidents who have actually been assassinated have had a worse go of it than President Trump who still lives and breathes and gets to love his family, be loved in return.
Learn our comms.
What do you mean?