Misinterpretation, IMO.

From the Left's perspective the issue is Israel as an ethnic nation-state. Because it will never allow Jews to be in the minority, they call it an apartheid state. It will not allow its sovereignty to be trampled or its existence to be stopped. Therefore, it is the enemy of the globalist project. It has to be brought down, just like Russia, just like Trump, and for the same reasons.

From Q's perspective, the issue is deeper. Q deals in layers of meaning, so there's always some room to interpret here, but I suspect Q refers to a specific set of families within the broader Jewish diaspora. These are people with deep historical ties to Israel, but who may not even be practicing Jews today. These are the "they" we refer to when we talk about who controls the world. These are the people who use their money to buy whole governments. We're not talking about people like the Pritzkers in Chicago, for example. They hold enormous power, but not that much. Here, we're in Soros territory, but remember, he's new money on the scene. He's not the old money, the 13 families money, the kind with ties to Canaan and Ba'al worship that predates Biblical Israel. That's who Q is talking about taking down. Yes, these people control the nation-state of Israel today, but that's a superficial part of what they actually represent.

There's no cognitive dissonance here, only the use of the single term Israel when it has two distinct meanings.