As 2023 continues, the European Commission appears busy developing and running pilots for its EU Digital Identity Wallet (EUDI), which it intends to make available to all EU citizens in the near future. But while the European Commission (EC) boasts the prospective EUDI’s convenience, security, and wide range of prospective use cases in daily life, what’s less discussed is the tool’s potential for a bevy of ethical and surveillance-related issues.
The EU Digital Wallet, often referred to as the EU Digital Identity Wallet (EUDI), is slated to be offered to the European public in the years ahead. According to the European Commission, “EU Digital Identity Wallets are personal digital wallets allowing citizens to digitally identify themselves, store and manage identity data and official documents in electronic format. These may include a driving licence, medical prescriptions or education qualifications.”
As legislation streamlining their slated use across Europe is finalized, the European Commission is advancing its efforts to roll out EUDIs amongst the general European public, where over 250 private corporations and public authorities are participating in four large-scale pilot projects. At the time of writing, the EU has invested €46 million into these pilots.
Indeed , a wide range of use cases are already being tested in the EUDI pilot projects. These include using the wallets to access government services, register, and activate SIM cards for mobile network services, sign contracts, facilitate travel, and present educational credentials. All together, these use cases suggest the Digital Identity Wallets’ prospective utilization across a wide range of services essential to daily life. — The Brownstone Institute
So, while our attention is focused on wars and rumors of wars across the globe, the increasingly dismal state of affairs continues here in the US, and the never-ending culture war, the globalists are steadily moving their plans forward.
We know that our friends in the WEF have been gaming these kinds of technology out, determining how best to facilitate their various agendas all the while selling us on all the perceived positives. The real purpose of this kind of tech lies in what they don’t say.
For example, they say that this Digital ID will ‘open up the digital world’ for individuals who use it, the deeper implication here is that there is the possibility to close off the digital world as well.
The unspoken part is the most critical:
They want the 2030s to be the ‘Digital Decade’, meaning that a lot of these critical aspects of the technocracy have to have been already rolled out for awhile by the time this decade arrives. Chances are that they will continue to fast track all the tech you'd associate with a post great-reset world over the next several years.
Fortunately you can fight back against the emerging technocracy by doing two things: spreading awareness and becoming as self sufficient as possible. The less you have to rely on daddy government, the less you will be affected by their systems.” — Ryan DeLarme