The author espouses the formation of the United States in 1787 as part of the Great Awakening
There is a great deal of fuckery in the actual government we got at its foundation. As just one example, the fifth amendment includes explicit statements that people in our military have no constitutional rights. Military enrollment (conscription) was not optional, so really, no one had any rights under any condition where the PTB considered the public to be endangered (AKA "National Security"). Women had no rights. Slaves had no rights, but it wasn't just them. No one but a land owner could participate in government at all. Indeed, no one else could even vote. Land owners made up a very small percent of the population at the time (I think around 6%). Most men were wage laborers, indentured servants, or slaves.
The government we actually got was made strictly and intentionally for the Aristocrats.
The fifth amendment also makes clear that the government ultimately owns everyone's property.
nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
If the Aristocrats who run the government want your stuff they can take it. No ifs, ands, or buts about it. You can't defend your property from the Rulers. It's written into the constitution. The Right to Defend your property is inalienable, but this writ of Treaty, which no one but a few people actually signed, states unequivocally that the people who run the government (Aristocrats, every single one), are the Ultimate Authority over your property.
Prior to a "Constitutional Republic" that type of government had a different name, it was called feudalism.
The author espouses Lincoln's assassination as a loss for the Great Awakening
After looking into Lincoln, I do not think he was a hero at all. If you consider the actual consequences of his actions, either his efforts were subverted, or they were intentional. Yes, there was the whole "greenback" thing, but he had still taken out so many loans already that it was a meaningless gesture. BOTH SIDES of the civil war had indebted themselves to the bankers so deeply that America has never recovered since. People blame the Fed for our debt problems. It was actually the Civil War that did it. The Fed was inevitable after that indebtedness.
The Civil War also wasn't about slavery. It was about setting up the Federal Government as Sovereign over the States. Lincoln ensured that the "United States," a treaty of Sovereign States became the "United States," a single nation, with subordinate areas called "States" in name only.
Aside from all of that, I'm not even convinced that Lincoln was assassinated. Literally everyone involved was an actor. His son was a Rockefeller croney. There is so much fuckery there... I think the reason Lincoln is an "American Hero" is purposeful promotion by the Cabal to hide what really happened.
The author espouses the speech by JFK as an exposure of the Cabal.
In context, this speech is actually about justifying silencing the media for "National Security."
This one is a tough one, because it really does two things. It brings to the fore ideas of an exposure of the Cabal. But it also is, in context, suggesting that it is talking about the Soviet Union. So is it a veiled message about the Cabal? Maybe. Is it a veiled message letting people know that the news is being censored by nefarious actors (the C_A) under false pretenses of "National Security"? Maybe.
I don't know what the intent is behind this speech. What it is saying is, "The USSR is evil, and because of that we need to censor the news, for the greater good; to keep everyone safe." That is what the speech says. However, the delivery is such that it sounds like something much more. It could be that that is exactly what it is; two speeches in one. A speech that was intended to have a double meaning. "Say what the Cabal wants you to say," and "Tell everyone the truth" at the same time.
I honestly have no idea. JFK is an enigma, no matter how deep I dig, his enigmatic nature persists. That alone makes him stand out. Everyone else I dig into lose any "enigma" quality after not too much investigation. These investigations inevitably suggest that by force or by choice, everyone else is Cabal.
There is a lot going on with the ideas espoused in the clip in the OP, but the context surrounding them is important. Whatever the truth is, there is more to everything than it appears on the surface. Understanding someone's true motives is impossible. The best "red pills" are the ones that get people to ask the right questions. I'm not convinced that this piece will convince anyone to do that who hasn't already done so.
He was a great patriot stuck between a rock and a hard place.
France, Spain, and England were all butt hurt over losing their colonies, and were looking for any way to get back onto the continent.
The Confederacy's would-be alliance with France they were trying to solidify would have given them solid entry to land an army, recognize them as an independant nation, betray the South and start taking America again.
England, likewise, would have been more than happy to ally with North in exchange for land, or other machinations which would only end up destroying the country.
The only real ally we could count on at the time was Russia, who helped blockade Europe from invading during the Civil War.
Lincoln did what he did as he and others believed only a unified America could withstand the European nations, and prevent invasion.
While trying to save the Union, he was pressured into suspending states rights and breaking the constitution, enacting taxes, etc. Much of what we have to deal with comes from the fact the week or two before he planned to repeal them after the war, he was assassinated, and no one else voted to make them go away.
Dig deeper. Look at his actual writing. The guy gives one good speech (Gettysburg address), and people ignore the other 9000 thousand things he wrote. I REALLY can't find redeeming qualities in him. The more I dig, the worse he gets.
Here are a few resources. I don't remember the specifics of the first couple, but I wouldn't have kept them if they didn't have compelling evidence. They are from my annotated bibliography. I will just list a few of many more I have:
Some interesting claims about Lincolns assassination were made by Lafayette C. Baker, Lincoln's head of Intel (equivalent to the head of the C_A). These claims were "debunked" by Edward Steers, Jr. who himself has numerous ties to Rockefeller et al, who wrote articles for the ALA (Abrahama Lincoln Association), which was funded by the Rockefeller Foundation.
You can also read Miles' Mathis stuff on Lincoln. I disagree with many of his conclusions, but his stated facts are usually pretty good places to dig.
There is a HUGE amount more about Lincoln, but that should be enough to get you started.
France, Spain, and England were all butt hurt over losing their colonies, and were looking for any way to get back onto the continent.
Sure, but they were all dancing to the same drummer, AKA the banksters.
All of your protests are the standard fare. Dig deeper. Any one of those points has substantial further evidence to support opposite conclusions to the ones you suggest. Pick one and I will see what I can find to help you begin a deeper investigation. I have a lot of notes.
Thank you for posting the link and comments regarding Lincoln and the country’s evolution. Your conclusion is spot on at the end. No party ever wins regarding any war, except the bankers and their government supporters providing empowerment. The transition from a government founded on the principles of sovereign statehood into the current form of central Federal control has led to excessive control and loss of freedom. The Civil War led to the founding of federal taxation (prior to the war tariffs were the sole means of Federal Govt funding), the gold standard was quickly disrupted and abandoned, the military industrial complex was established, and govt agency bureaucracy flourished. My ancestors arrived at Charleston SC in 1752, leaving a life of serfdom in Germany to search for freedom in the new land. They moved inland and settled in what is known as Lexington county, a bordering county to Columbia. They acquired a small amount of land, bequeathed by the King of England and began a family farm. When they felt the infringement of freedom they did their part at both Cowpens and Kings Mountain to support the founding of a new nation. They helped build the first Church in Lexington county, St. Stephens Lutheran. My ancestors never owned slaves, I’d like to think that fleeing a life of serfdom had something to do with this, maybe they were just too poor, or maybe having ministers in the family had something to do with it. In 1865, General Kilpatrick, during Shermans march through the South, burned my family’s farm to the ground, destroyed their crops, and killed their livestock. They then burned the St. Stephens Church to the ground. They stole the best and destroyed the rest. Simply living in South Carolina was enough of a crime, the Federal Govt needed to pronounce punishment. So much for Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. My family eventually returned to rebuild, but had to give most of their land to the bankers. Later in the 1920’s the government began impounding property to create a dam on the Saluda River and create a hydroelectric facility. People were required to take $15/acre for their land. My family contested this to no avail. Today, I am not able to visit the graves of my ancestors. Their bodies lie now deep beneath the cold waters of Lake Murray, South Carolina, their graves being flooded over. I now look at current events and think nothing has really changed for the better having the power/authority primarily being a Federal government. The Government continues to grow, our freedoms diminish and are under siege, we are told to abandon religious and moral principles, the government continues to confiscate land and possessions leading to the point that we will eventually own nothing, the need for control over the population cannot be satisfied, the bankers and uber wealthy (or lifetime politicians) make out like bandits while generation after generation die while being forced to pay our taxes and support the folly. How can people continue without asking, WHY?
Several thoughts on the clip in the OP:
The author espouses the formation of the United States in 1787 as part of the Great Awakening
There is a great deal of fuckery in the actual government we got at its foundation. As just one example, the fifth amendment includes explicit statements that people in our military have no constitutional rights. Military enrollment (conscription) was not optional, so really, no one had any rights under any condition where the PTB considered the public to be endangered (AKA "National Security"). Women had no rights. Slaves had no rights, but it wasn't just them. No one but a land owner could participate in government at all. Indeed, no one else could even vote. Land owners made up a very small percent of the population at the time (I think around 6%). Most men were wage laborers, indentured servants, or slaves.
The government we actually got was made strictly and intentionally for the Aristocrats.
The fifth amendment also makes clear that the government ultimately owns everyone's property.
If the Aristocrats who run the government want your stuff they can take it. No ifs, ands, or buts about it. You can't defend your property from the Rulers. It's written into the constitution. The Right to Defend your property is inalienable, but this writ of Treaty, which no one but a few people actually signed, states unequivocally that the people who run the government (Aristocrats, every single one), are the Ultimate Authority over your property.
Prior to a "Constitutional Republic" that type of government had a different name, it was called feudalism.
The author espouses Lincoln's assassination as a loss for the Great Awakening
After looking into Lincoln, I do not think he was a hero at all. If you consider the actual consequences of his actions, either his efforts were subverted, or they were intentional. Yes, there was the whole "greenback" thing, but he had still taken out so many loans already that it was a meaningless gesture. BOTH SIDES of the civil war had indebted themselves to the bankers so deeply that America has never recovered since. People blame the Fed for our debt problems. It was actually the Civil War that did it. The Fed was inevitable after that indebtedness.
The Civil War also wasn't about slavery. It was about setting up the Federal Government as Sovereign over the States. Lincoln ensured that the "United States," a treaty of Sovereign States became the "United States," a single nation, with subordinate areas called "States" in name only.
Aside from all of that, I'm not even convinced that Lincoln was assassinated. Literally everyone involved was an actor. His son was a Rockefeller croney. There is so much fuckery there... I think the reason Lincoln is an "American Hero" is purposeful promotion by the Cabal to hide what really happened.
The author espouses the speech by JFK as an exposure of the Cabal.
In context, this speech is actually about justifying silencing the media for "National Security."
This one is a tough one, because it really does two things. It brings to the fore ideas of an exposure of the Cabal. But it also is, in context, suggesting that it is talking about the Soviet Union. So is it a veiled message about the Cabal? Maybe. Is it a veiled message letting people know that the news is being censored by nefarious actors (the C_A) under false pretenses of "National Security"? Maybe.
I don't know what the intent is behind this speech. What it is saying is, "The USSR is evil, and because of that we need to censor the news, for the greater good; to keep everyone safe." That is what the speech says. However, the delivery is such that it sounds like something much more. It could be that that is exactly what it is; two speeches in one. A speech that was intended to have a double meaning. "Say what the Cabal wants you to say," and "Tell everyone the truth" at the same time.
I honestly have no idea. JFK is an enigma, no matter how deep I dig, his enigmatic nature persists. That alone makes him stand out. Everyone else I dig into lose any "enigma" quality after not too much investigation. These investigations inevitably suggest that by force or by choice, everyone else is Cabal.
There is a lot going on with the ideas espoused in the clip in the OP, but the context surrounding them is important. Whatever the truth is, there is more to everything than it appears on the surface. Understanding someone's true motives is impossible. The best "red pills" are the ones that get people to ask the right questions. I'm not convinced that this piece will convince anyone to do that who hasn't already done so.
Do not judge Lincoln too harshly.
Lincoln was a tragic hero at worst.
He was a great patriot stuck between a rock and a hard place.
France, Spain, and England were all butt hurt over losing their colonies, and were looking for any way to get back onto the continent.
The Confederacy's would-be alliance with France they were trying to solidify would have given them solid entry to land an army, recognize them as an independant nation, betray the South and start taking America again.
England, likewise, would have been more than happy to ally with North in exchange for land, or other machinations which would only end up destroying the country.
The only real ally we could count on at the time was Russia, who helped blockade Europe from invading during the Civil War.
Lincoln did what he did as he and others believed only a unified America could withstand the European nations, and prevent invasion.
While trying to save the Union, he was pressured into suspending states rights and breaking the constitution, enacting taxes, etc. Much of what we have to deal with comes from the fact the week or two before he planned to repeal them after the war, he was assassinated, and no one else voted to make them go away.
Dig deeper. Look at his actual writing. The guy gives one good speech (Gettysburg address), and people ignore the other 9000 thousand things he wrote. I REALLY can't find redeeming qualities in him. The more I dig, the worse he gets.
Here are a few resources. I don't remember the specifics of the first couple, but I wouldn't have kept them if they didn't have compelling evidence. They are from my annotated bibliography. I will just list a few of many more I have:
Abraham Lincoln, Slavery, Lies, Lies, and More Lies
Facts about the Lincoln Assassination
Some interesting claims about Lincolns assassination were made by Lafayette C. Baker, Lincoln's head of Intel (equivalent to the head of the C_A). These claims were "debunked" by Edward Steers, Jr. who himself has numerous ties to Rockefeller et al, who wrote articles for the ALA (Abrahama Lincoln Association), which was funded by the Rockefeller Foundation.
You can also read Miles' Mathis stuff on Lincoln. I disagree with many of his conclusions, but his stated facts are usually pretty good places to dig.
There is a HUGE amount more about Lincoln, but that should be enough to get you started.
Sure, but they were all dancing to the same drummer, AKA the banksters.
All of your protests are the standard fare. Dig deeper. Any one of those points has substantial further evidence to support opposite conclusions to the ones you suggest. Pick one and I will see what I can find to help you begin a deeper investigation. I have a lot of notes.
Thank you for posting the link and comments regarding Lincoln and the country’s evolution. Your conclusion is spot on at the end. No party ever wins regarding any war, except the bankers and their government supporters providing empowerment. The transition from a government founded on the principles of sovereign statehood into the current form of central Federal control has led to excessive control and loss of freedom. The Civil War led to the founding of federal taxation (prior to the war tariffs were the sole means of Federal Govt funding), the gold standard was quickly disrupted and abandoned, the military industrial complex was established, and govt agency bureaucracy flourished. My ancestors arrived at Charleston SC in 1752, leaving a life of serfdom in Germany to search for freedom in the new land. They moved inland and settled in what is known as Lexington county, a bordering county to Columbia. They acquired a small amount of land, bequeathed by the King of England and began a family farm. When they felt the infringement of freedom they did their part at both Cowpens and Kings Mountain to support the founding of a new nation. They helped build the first Church in Lexington county, St. Stephens Lutheran. My ancestors never owned slaves, I’d like to think that fleeing a life of serfdom had something to do with this, maybe they were just too poor, or maybe having ministers in the family had something to do with it. In 1865, General Kilpatrick, during Shermans march through the South, burned my family’s farm to the ground, destroyed their crops, and killed their livestock. They then burned the St. Stephens Church to the ground. They stole the best and destroyed the rest. Simply living in South Carolina was enough of a crime, the Federal Govt needed to pronounce punishment. So much for Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. My family eventually returned to rebuild, but had to give most of their land to the bankers. Later in the 1920’s the government began impounding property to create a dam on the Saluda River and create a hydroelectric facility. People were required to take $15/acre for their land. My family contested this to no avail. Today, I am not able to visit the graves of my ancestors. Their bodies lie now deep beneath the cold waters of Lake Murray, South Carolina, their graves being flooded over. I now look at current events and think nothing has really changed for the better having the power/authority primarily being a Federal government. The Government continues to grow, our freedoms diminish and are under siege, we are told to abandon religious and moral principles, the government continues to confiscate land and possessions leading to the point that we will eventually own nothing, the need for control over the population cannot be satisfied, the bankers and uber wealthy (or lifetime politicians) make out like bandits while generation after generation die while being forced to pay our taxes and support the folly. How can people continue without asking, WHY?
Wow. Your words left me speechless