Is there anything Flynn could say that would lessen your belief in Q? If no, maybe you need to strongly consider that position. Everyone is capable of being wrong about something, even those on this site.
I'm not saying anything about the veracity of Q, but if you hold a position that no amount of evidence would dissuade you, you're in danger of believing something over the available evidence. Why? Could it be because that's what all WANT to happen, rather than what's really happening?
Everyone likes to talk about the "coincidences" of the Q movement, but what about the misses? "Trust Sessions" - How did that work out? Should we "Trust Sessions"?
Is there anything Flynn could say that would lessen your belief in Q? If no, maybe you need to strongly consider that position. Everyone is capable of being wrong about something, even those on this site.
I'm not saying anything about the veracity of Q, but if you hold a position that no amount of evidence would dissuade you, you're in danger of believing something over the available evidence. Why? Could it be because that's what all WANT to happen, rather than what's really happening?
Everyone likes to talk about the "coincidences" of the Q movement, but what about the misses? "Trust Sessions" - How did that work out? Should we "Trust Sessions"?
The psyop is unshakable; all inconvenient information gets chalked up as optics or “disinformation is necessary”.