This article reads like a fake news hit piece. Forget who it's about for a second... it starts with a "hey you're ignorant of this guy you better read me" then a few paragraphs in, after making original topic negative, introduce the real smear topic and only go back to the first topic to reaffirm smear on 2nd topic. I hate this tactic and it's become so obvious to me at this point. If you have sauce link it and be straight forward if it's consequential. I'm more suspicious of this author than Flynn atm.