The very existence of FISA and the justices participation in the administration of general warrants disqualifies these traitors from any pretense of credibility.
That statement is assinine on its face. If you have a problem with FISA, which I doubt you even knew existed until the last few years, why haven't you been petitioning it's removal since 1978 when it was enacted by Congress?
Or, preferably why not challenge its existence through the courts and get it ruled unconstitutional? They would do it you know, if it was in fact, unconstitutional.
The court has no interest in justice, But keeping the status quo intact.
Who are you talking about, specifically?
SCOTUS isn't some ruling council that can push edicts from on high. Are you sure you understand what they are allowed to do Constitutionally?
So far they have been fantastic the last few years. A couple rulings that seem to have not gone our way were, in fact ruled correctly for the cases.
They can't just make stuff up, or go off on tangents, or stuff not specifically related to the cases presented.
The very existence of FISA and the justices participation in the administration of general warrants disqualifies these traitors from any pretense of credibility.
That statement is assinine on its face. If you have a problem with FISA, which I doubt you even knew existed until the last few years, why haven't you been petitioning it's removal since 1978 when it was enacted by Congress?
Or, preferably why not challenge its existence through the courts and get it ruled unconstitutional? They would do it you know, if it was in fact, unconstitutional.