Does it need to be exciting? Or true? I'll admit that some of it can be just a tad boring, as unpleasant as it is to admit. But it's also extremely exciting to read the Gospels or to read a passage in the Old Testament that is clearly talking about Jesus Christ hundreds of years before he lived.
The Emerald Tablets piqued my interest because they were less well known. More esoteric. Not accepted and hidden away. This doesn't make them true, and is the perfect recipe to be led astray by the "fun" or "exciting" thing rather than lead to truth by the "boring" but true thing.
Truth is not to be based on feeling. Our feelings are not only often wrong or irrational, but they also contradict each other's feelings. This is why we need an objective standard.
I don't only believe things that I find agreeable. I do trust my intuition, to be clear, but when the Bible says something I didn't think was true, I look into it and find that the Bible is right or at least makes a perfectly valid and compelling case. So I change for God, I don't find a "god" that fits me. Because without an objective source of truth, something that I am not, there is no truth at all.
And the way I see it, if I always agree with God, I'm not agreeing with God. I'm just agreeing with myself. The notion that I'd get everything right exactly as God ordained it is highly unlikely in my mind.
To be clear, I always found this quite easy. I went from an agnostic to a hardliner Christian in a couple of months. It really feels more like a day. I realized one day I believed and everything changed. I found it exceptionally easy to just believe the Bible and cede my authority to God, which was quite the opposite of the mindset I'd been fostering spending a lot of time here on GAW, and of my general mindset all my life.
So I don't know what it is like to face the opposite problem of not wanting to cede my authority to God, or not finding it compelling. But I still think that to believe in God is to deny what you know to some degree. Some stuff will align, but we don't know everything and God does, so every truth we learn shouldn't necessarily go down easy, so to speak. There's going to be some big red pills in there. Some big ways of thinking that we aren't correct on.
And respectfully, how can you possibly believe you have found some kind of personal, spiritual truth when there are a dozen other people who claim the same thing, but they claim they were led to an exclusionary truth? Islam isn't compatible with Christianity, which isn't compatible with Judaism, which I'd assume isn't compatible with your spiritual beliefs.
Many of these "truths" contradict each other. They can not all be true. And if Islam is right, I'm going to Hell. Is Christianity is right, that could very well be your path. I don't intend to be one of those fire and brimstone "you're going to hell! Repent!" types, but it's a real possibility if you're wrong.
And what even is truth? If it comes from God, it is objective. Not something one gets to pick between several options on.
I mean, the truth I have found is that the only way to the Father is through the Lord Jesus Christ. This excludes every Muslim, every Jew, every Atheist, and every "spiritual but not religious" person. This certainly isn't the same truth you have found. So who is right? How do we know? Can we know?
I think we can, and I think God gives us exactly what we need in the Bible and His Church.
For one, the Bible makes verifiable, historical claims. The Gospels in particular lay out Jesus' life in a way that we can verify. And history does verify Christ's life as the Bible lays it out.
For another, it's uniquely based on salvation by grace and by Jesus' death on the cross to pay the price for our sins.
If you honestly just can't muster up the attention/focus/interest to read the Bible, I'd suggest going to Church. There was quite some time when the commoners were illiterate and relied on the Church for their teachings. Though, they were still getting the Word of God from the Bible, just in a way they understood. It may be more digestible if you find reading it yourself too boring.
Does it need to be exciting? Or true? I'll admit that some of it can be just a tad boring, as unpleasant as it is to admit. But it's also extremely exciting to read the Gospels or to read a passage in the Old Testament that is clearly talking about Jesus Christ hundreds of years before he lived.
The Emerald Tablets piqued my interest because they were less well known. More esoteric. Not accepted and hidden away. This doesn't make them true, and is the perfect recipe to be led astray by the "fun" or "exciting" thing rather than lead to truth by the "boring" but true thing.
Truth is not to be based on feeling. Our feelings are not only often wrong or irrational, but they also contradict each other's feelings. This is why we need an objective standard.
I don't only believe things that I find agreeable. I do trust my intuition, to be clear, but when the Bible says something I didn't think was true, I look into it and find that the Bible is right or at least makes a perfectly valid and compelling case. So I change for God, I don't find a "god" that fits me. Because without an objective source of truth, something that I am not, there is no truth at all.
And the way I see it, if I always agree with God, I'm not agreeing with God. I'm just agreeing with myself. The notion that I'd get everything right exactly as God ordained it is highly unlikely in my mind.
To be clear, I always found this quite easy. I went from an agnostic to a hardliner Christian in a couple of months. It really feels more like a day. I realized one day I believed and everything changed. I found it exceptionally easy to just believe the Bible and cede my authority to God, which was quite the opposite of the mindset I'd been fostering spending a lot of time here on GAW, and of my general mindset all my life.
So I don't know what it is like to face the opposite problem of not wanting to cede my authority to God, or not finding it compelling. But I still think that to believe in God is to deny what you know to some degree. Some stuff will align, but we don't know everything and God does, so every truth we learn shouldn't necessarily go down easy, so to speak. There's going to be some big red pills in there. Some big ways of thinking that we aren't correct on.
And respectfully, how can you possibly believe you have found some kind of personal, spiritual truth when there are a dozen other people who claim the same thing, but they claim they were led to an exclusionary truth? Islam isn't compatible with Christianity, which isn't compatible with Judaism, which I'd assume isn't compatible with your spiritual beliefs.
Many of these "truths" contradict each other. They can not all be true. And if Islam is right, I'm going to Hell. Is Christianity is right, that could very well be your path. I don't intend to be one of those fire and brimstone "you're going to hell! Repent!" types, but it's a real possibility if you're wrong.
And what even is truth? If it comes from God, it is objective. Not something one gets to pick between several options on.
I mean, the truth I have found is that the only way to the Father is through the Lord Jesus Christ. This excludes every Muslim, every Jew, every Atheist, and every "spiritual but not religious" person. This certainly isn't the same truth you have found. So who is right? How do we know? Can we know?
I think we can, and I think God gives us exactly what we need in the Bible and His Church.
For one, the Bible makes verifiable, historical claims. The Gospels in particular lay out Jesus' life in a way that we can verify. And history does verify Christ's life as the Bible lays it out.
For another, it's uniquely based on salvation by grace and by Jesus' death on the cross to pay the price for our sins.
If you honestly just can't muster up the attention/focus/interest to read the Bible, I'd suggest going to Church. There was quite some time when the commoners were illiterate and relied on the Church for their teachings. Though, they were still getting the Word of God from the Bible, just in a way they understood. It may be more digestible if you find reading it yourself too boring.