Dana White Rips UFC Bud Light Sponsor Critics ... I'm Not A Sellout!!! #hypocritical - The Great Awakening

Dana White Rips UFC Bud Light Sponsor Critics ... I'm Not A Sellout!!! #hypocritical (web.archive.org) - SALT -

posted 1 year ago by UltraSupraMaga 1 year ago by UltraSupraMaga +39 / -0

Dana White Rips UFC Bud Light Sponsor Critics, Deal Had Nothing To Do W/ Money

Dana White is adamantly denying he's a sellout for getting back in bed with Bud Light following the Dylan Mulvaney controversy.

14 comments

14 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (14)

sorted by:

▲ 12 ▼

– frazzledrip 12 points 1 year ago +13 / -1

Drop your current beer sponsor for the one that completely fucked theirselves by submitting to woke society and it nearly broke them, and in a last call , hail mary attempt to save their business, they offer you an astronomical amount of money to be your sponsor and you take it.

That pretty much defines selling out.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 6 ▼

– Khakiclay 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

Or he took 100 million dollars to build his brand and he doesn't care if the fans buy Bud Light or not

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– frelliesgreens 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

if anyone wants a beer at a ufc event it will have to be bud though.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– OGpat 1 point 1 year ago +2 / -1

Either way, he’s an official douchebag now.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ -2 ▼

– 15th_dimension -2 points 1 year ago +1 / -3

why? its only going to further damage AB.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q