The problem with V for Vendetta is that Christian Conservatives were the "bad" guys while gays were the "good" guys. It also portrays the British public watching television as being sceptical of everything their tyrannical government said, which the scamdemic proved otherwise.
Yes, the film did reverse the roles, but this was likely the only way the White Hats behind the film could get it past the censors and into theatres. If you read behind the lines, you can clearly see who the tyrants in the film are meant to represent.
The British public portrayed in the film were only skeptical of the news once V came along and gave them the bread crumbs to lead them to the truth. V and Q are a lot alike in that regard.
The problem with V for Vendetta is that Christian Conservatives were the "bad" guys while gays were the "good" guys. It also portrays the British public watching television as being sceptical of everything their tyrannical government said, which the scamdemic proved otherwise.
Couple things to note . . .
Yes, the film did reverse the roles, but this was likely the only way the White Hats behind the film could get it past the censors and into theatres. If you read behind the lines, you can clearly see who the tyrants in the film are meant to represent.
The British public portrayed in the film were only skeptical of the news once V came along and gave them the bread crumbs to lead them to the truth. V and Q are a lot alike in that regard.
my thoughts exactly Qanaut, great critical thinking skills you have.