Judge crushes ATF AR-15 gun ban
(www.washingtonexaminer.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (38)
sorted by:
Well .... Good for this judge, but in my view abysmal.
The second amendment says:
So ...... when reading the 1934 (after 1933 bankruptcy congressional law) it says inherently dangerous and generally lacking usefulness, except for violent and criminal purposes.
So, the test should be: a law made by congress is pursuant to the Constitution.
What on Gods green earth do these judges not understand? The Constitution, as it clearly says: SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.
Congress and the judges do that, time and again. They violate their oath.
This judge is contend with settling the matter under the header of relief within the statutory jurisdiction and leaves the Constitutional question for another time.
So he is looking bottom up, the government acts top down.
As Oliver Hardy often said: A fine mess you got me into.
I keep pointing out with the last SCOTUS Bruen ruling the only restrictions they can use are the ones the Founding Fathers had at that time. There were none. Andrew Jackson purchased firearms from the people to supply his army to meet the British in New Orleans.
The left knows as they had a meltdown over the Bruen ruling.