The recent failed SpaceX Starship launch flushed out the "Flat Earth" retards in droves, making "FIRMAMENT" trend on Elon Musk's X.com. Is it a psyop targeting fuckwits? Yup. Check this graphic sowing the obvious #'d BOT ACCOUNTS. Each account tweeted random Flat Earth faggotry. INFORMATION WARFARE!
(media.greatawakening.win)
🧠 These people are stupid!
I mean, these are clearly bots, sure, but are they cabal bots? How would we know?
But let's say they are, that still leaves two possibilities:
Meanwhile, on X, I can find a few accounts that at least make plausible sounding claims, and that present models that are mostly workable alternatives, at least on the surface. That's not to say there aren't issues, because none of them seem to be able to explain the Southern Hemisphere's stars being different or the lunar eclipse very well. But I digress.
If it's this one, it's working.
If it's this one, it's working.
And of course, not many are actually "calling out" any disinformation. There is certainly no research in here showing that these are cabal bots owned by 'x' organization that are employing 'y' coordinated talking point.
This thread is basically just people shitting on views that flat earthers don't actually, from what I can tell, hold, or people making grandiose claims that every single person promoting FE is some CIA plant (which ironically will also just drive away certain honest truth seekers), and then there's the people saying we should be more open-minded in response to certain theories like FE (not that we should entertain it all the time, but just that people's response to it here is unfounded).
What isn't here, is anyone doing a dig on these bots and then people saying we should be open-minded to FE in response to that.
What is here, is people dismissing FE out of hand for what clearly appears to be more emotional and/or "political" (in that we don't want to drive people away from our more important research, so many find it better to just ignore, or even attack, FE) reasons.
Many people seem more emotion rather than critical in this thread, which is rare for this forum. At least, that's my observation.