If you want to sticky this kind of post, you need to be willing to allow it's open discussion. By doing this, you are being no different than any other platform that censors free speech. You are holding a very biased opinion, and by denying it's discussion while providing this view point in such a public way shows a big flaw to the leadership of this platform. You should reconsider this approach.
It's not about what is or isn't allowed. It is your condescending stance on issues you do not want us to discuss. It's unfair and biased. This meme was unacceptable.
What precisely is inaccurate about this meme? And, more importantly, WHY WHY WHY is it ALWAYS that these criticisms come from tards with "once or twice a month" post histories like yours?
If you want to sticky this kind of post, you need to be willing to allow it's open discussion. By doing this, you are being no different than any other platform that censors free speech. You are holding a very biased opinion, and by denying it's discussion while providing this view point in such a public way shows a big flaw to the leadership of this platform. You should reconsider this approach.
This handy Venn diagram should answer all your questions.
It's not about what is or isn't allowed. It is your condescending stance on issues you do not want us to discuss. It's unfair and biased. This meme was unacceptable.
What precisely is inaccurate about this meme? And, more importantly, WHY WHY WHY is it ALWAYS that these criticisms come from tards with "once or twice a month" post histories like yours?
Bud Light. Bleachers. Go there.