So the US got all these assets mobilized in a matter of what 30 minutes? The plane had a fire ok I can accept that, and you're telling us the comms all went dark, the plane turned around and actually flew over the airport it was going to make an emergency landing at, and it seems NOBODY at that airport was even aware there was an emergency and nobody at the airport with radar and just eyes saw a flaming plane go cruising by that wanted to make an emergency landing? They plane would have squawked emergency the second the fire was detected. To get the plane in the position he was saying, he speculated a LOT. Like he didn't land because he might have had landing gear failure, and he lost ALL comms, and was told to fly to some crazy location in the middle of the ocean away from land by an unknown communication, and the pilot with a raging fire onboard was like "yeah cool no problem", and not contact the airport or even squawk emergency?? I'm not questioning his science, but question his whole theory on how the plane supposedly got to the location he said it did.
I agree with your analysis. The streamer is basing his theory on the faulty (in my opinion) premiss that the jet fire was an accident. He then goes on to assume that the endothermic event was therefore a rescue operation.
I do not share that notion. I think it is more likely that the fire was intentionally started, and the jets communications were jammed prior to the endothermic event. If that is the case, then what we are seeing is a high tech kidnapping, or perhaps murder. Perhaps someone thought the people on that jet, and/or the cargo needed to be "disappeared" without any trace, or even potential of ever being found.
The idea that nefarious actors could be possession of such advanced technology is pretty scary to think about.
So the US got all these assets mobilized in a matter of what 30 minutes? The plane had a fire ok I can accept that, and you're telling us the comms all went dark, the plane turned around and actually flew over the airport it was going to make an emergency landing at, and it seems NOBODY at that airport was even aware there was an emergency and nobody at the airport with radar and just eyes saw a flaming plane go cruising by that wanted to make an emergency landing? They plane would have squawked emergency the second the fire was detected. To get the plane in the position he was saying, he speculated a LOT. Like he didn't land because he might have had landing gear failure, and he lost ALL comms, and was told to fly to some crazy location in the middle of the ocean away from land by an unknown communication, and the pilot with a raging fire onboard was like "yeah cool no problem", and not contact the airport or even squawk emergency?? I'm not questioning his science, but question his whole theory on how the plane supposedly got to the location he said it did.
I agree with your analysis. The streamer is basing his theory on the faulty (in my opinion) premiss that the jet fire was an accident. He then goes on to assume that the endothermic event was therefore a rescue operation.
I do not share that notion. I think it is more likely that the fire was intentionally started, and the jets communications were jammed prior to the endothermic event. If that is the case, then what we are seeing is a high tech kidnapping, or perhaps murder. Perhaps someone thought the people on that jet, and/or the cargo needed to be "disappeared" without any trace, or even potential of ever being found.
The idea that nefarious actors could be possession of such advanced technology is pretty scary to think about.