Unless they can manipulate the images you can get with a good telescope in your own backyard, you can see all the crap they left on the moons surface. Oh, but maybe the moon isn't real either and is just a hologram! Yeah, that's the ticket! Kek
I looked at the moon through a massive telescope in Colorado. Didn't see equipment and they didn't point any out yet they claimed we were looking g at the very spot the apollo landed.
No telescope on Earth can see the leftover descent stages of the Apollo Lunar Modules or anything else Apollo-related. The laws of optics define its limits, and not even the Hubble Space Telescope can discern evidence of the Apollo landings.3 In 2002, astronomers tested the optics of the Very Large Telescope by imaging the Apollo landing sites, but the telescope provided a resolution of 130 meters, which was not good enough to resolve the 4.2 meters wide lunar landers or their long shadows.1 There is no telescope in existence or in planning that can do that.
Why do you think that comment was posted? Do you think that poster is just uninformed or lying?
Unless they can manipulate the images you can get with a good telescope in your own backyard, you can see all the crap they left on the moons surface. Oh, but maybe the moon isn't real either and is just a hologram! Yeah, that's the ticket! Kek
I looked at the moon through a massive telescope in Colorado. Didn't see equipment and they didn't point any out yet they claimed we were looking g at the very spot the apollo landed.
No telescope on Earth can see the leftover descent stages of the Apollo Lunar Modules or anything else Apollo-related. The laws of optics define its limits, and not even the Hubble Space Telescope can discern evidence of the Apollo landings.3 In 2002, astronomers tested the optics of the Very Large Telescope by imaging the Apollo landing sites, but the telescope provided a resolution of 130 meters, which was not good enough to resolve the 4.2 meters wide lunar landers or their long shadows.1 There is no telescope in existence or in planning that can do that.
Why do you think that comment was posted? Do you think that poster is just uninformed or lying?
I've seen those. But, as posted above by another, cognitive dissonance is huge with most. Even when you show irrefutable facts.
No you can't.
You should update your talking points.
Flip through your package of pre made approved talking points and try another one. Lol!