Francis seems to be neither Catholic nor pope, therefore Vigano ought to not follow him as such; instead he seems to promote the error of the SSPX or Lefebvre where Francis seemingly is both a modernist heretic and the pope of the Catholic Church.
Sure, here, Francis states the "official" policy of the Catholic Church is opposition to such unions, however then ambiguously whispers doubts about this policy and expresses vague statements that maybe a contrary opinion might be tenable... which instead raises doubts about if he is a pope at all, for a "doubtful pope is no pope".
Francis seems to be neither Catholic nor pope, therefore Vigano ought to not follow him as such; instead he seems to promote the error of the SSPX or Lefebvre where Francis seemingly is both a modernist heretic and the pope of the Catholic Church.
Sure, here, Francis states the "official" policy of the Catholic Church is opposition to such unions, however then ambiguously whispers doubts about this policy and expresses vague statements that maybe a contrary opinion might be tenable... which instead raises doubts about if he is a pope at all, for a "doubtful pope is no pope".