You absolutely implied that Vivek not being able to win was somehow specifically relevant to him and his campaign.
And talk about fucking butthurt... you certainly seem to be displaying some symptoms, fren.
And you know, I admit that I do like a lot of what Vivek says and personally think that he has an appealing personality. Obviously, this doesn't mean he's a good guy, it's easy to say stuff and act a certain way, but what I really don't like is how irrational people seem to be when it comes to him. Like there isn't a shred of evidence he's with the cabal (it's certainly never presented when people cry about him), yet somehow despite doing and saying the right things consistently throughout his campaign, which again I understand means nothing, people just conclude he must be a deepstate clown.
So my point is that you have absolutely nothing but conjecture to base your point on, and maybe a side point would be that a bunch of people around here are too fucking jaded to accept that there may be a good guy other than Trump. Which fair enough, our country and the world is pretty fucked right now, but can we at least try to present things with some level of factual basis? And not just slap everyone who isn't Trump with the "bad" sticker and start hypothesizing a bunch of shit based on that unsubstantiated premise?
It's almost like everyone is just butthurt people are running against Trump. As if every single person knows the plan and must either be working with white hats or black hats. Some people are neither, and also, working with white hats may entail running against Trump.
Edit: this shit reminds of the anti-Tucker and anti-Elon types. Maybe they're right, and it's a long-game scenario, but they're usually pretty fucking quiet these days.
How disingenuous (and how unfortunate that I made such a typo kek).
Shit like this is why people don't give genuine arguments online and play all the bullshit games to instead just try to "win" the "argument". No one wants to be on the receiving end of this shit when they're actually trying to make an honest argument, admit to their biases, but still present their argument from their perspective.
But why bother when this is the response? Unilateral invalidation of my entire argument because I was intellectually honest and upfront with my position. Real nice.
And yea, I downvoted a couple comments because I find it tiring to see people paint anyone who isn't the Big Don with the deepstate brush. Particularly when, again, I see no evidence of it. Vivek is uniquely "MAGA" in the debates, and sure, maybe that's the ploy, maybe they are trying to make him out like the Trump character in these debates, but I see no great evidence of this. Logical doesn't always mean true. Plenty of people said the same about Trump in 2016. Some still do. And obviously, I'm not voting for anyone but Trump, but that doesn't make every single other person on the political stage a villain.
I find it curious that he's the only Republican up there that isn't marching in lockstep with the deepstate, establishment agenda. Again, it's possible that it's a trick, but I see no reason to think it's as obvious as people try to make it seem. And frankly, I'd rather have hope that there are more good people left on our side than not, while losing nothing because I'm voting for Trump anyway. Me having hope does nothing other than open me up to being let down.
So apologies for being a little salty, I'm sure I came across as such because I am, I just find the frequently jaded discussions to be a bit tiring I guess.
Evidence?
Oh, you don't have any. Just an assumption.
You absolutely implied that Vivek not being able to win was somehow specifically relevant to him and his campaign.
And talk about fucking butthurt... you certainly seem to be displaying some symptoms, fren.
And you know, I admit that I do like a lot of what Vivek says and personally think that he has an appealing personality. Obviously, this doesn't mean he's a good guy, it's easy to say stuff and act a certain way, but what I really don't like is how irrational people seem to be when it comes to him. Like there isn't a shred of evidence he's with the cabal (it's certainly never presented when people cry about him), yet somehow despite doing and saying the right things consistently throughout his campaign, which again I understand means nothing, people just conclude he must be a deepstate clown.
So my point is that you have absolutely nothing but conjecture to base your point on, and maybe a side point would be that a bunch of people around here are too fucking jaded to accept that there may be a good guy other than Trump. Which fair enough, our country and the world is pretty fucked right now, but can we at least try to present things with some level of factual basis? And not just slap everyone who isn't Trump with the "bad" sticker and start hypothesizing a bunch of shit based on that unsubstantiated premise?
It's almost like everyone is just butthurt people are running against Trump. As if every single person knows the plan and must either be working with white hats or black hats. Some people are neither, and also, working with white hats may entail running against Trump.
Edit: this shit reminds of the anti-Tucker and anti-Elon types. Maybe they're right, and it's a long-game scenario, but they're usually pretty fucking quiet these days.
There we go...
How disingenuous (and how unfortunate that I made such a typo kek).
Shit like this is why people don't give genuine arguments online and play all the bullshit games to instead just try to "win" the "argument". No one wants to be on the receiving end of this shit when they're actually trying to make an honest argument, admit to their biases, but still present their argument from their perspective.
But why bother when this is the response? Unilateral invalidation of my entire argument because I was intellectually honest and upfront with my position. Real nice.
And yea, I downvoted a couple comments because I find it tiring to see people paint anyone who isn't the Big Don with the deepstate brush. Particularly when, again, I see no evidence of it. Vivek is uniquely "MAGA" in the debates, and sure, maybe that's the ploy, maybe they are trying to make him out like the Trump character in these debates, but I see no great evidence of this. Logical doesn't always mean true. Plenty of people said the same about Trump in 2016. Some still do. And obviously, I'm not voting for anyone but Trump, but that doesn't make every single other person on the political stage a villain.
I find it curious that he's the only Republican up there that isn't marching in lockstep with the deepstate, establishment agenda. Again, it's possible that it's a trick, but I see no reason to think it's as obvious as people try to make it seem. And frankly, I'd rather have hope that there are more good people left on our side than not, while losing nothing because I'm voting for Trump anyway. Me having hope does nothing other than open me up to being let down.
So apologies for being a little salty, I'm sure I came across as such because I am, I just find the frequently jaded discussions to be a bit tiring I guess.