The SCOTUS didn't strike down any legal opposition to the vaccines or mandates. They dismissed the rulings that had previously been made, some for and some against.
This in no way prevents or inhibits legal opposition. It can very well be seen as a set back, because if (when?) the federal govt tried to implement vaccine mandates in the future, cases would be have to be brought again, because the legal precedents that were set were vacated, meaning they were wiped in terms of having legal precedent.
Framing this as "striking down any legal opposition to " mandates etc, is extremely bogus. It's not factual.
I suggest you might not get as many clicks if you actually just stick to factual information instead of posting things with narrative spin, but you'd be doing the board a favor by practicing a higher standard and not encouraging hyper emotionalized reactions that merely stimulate narrative spin as opposed to clear thinking, objective evaluation and free thought.
Came here to say this. Injunctive relief is extraordinary relief. Once the mandate was removed there is nothing for the courts to hear. That's why Biden Admin vacated the mandate before there could be a ruling.
Your headline is extremely misleading and full of interpretation.
I read through the source article: at https://thevaccinereaction.org/
The SCOTUS didn't strike down any legal opposition to the vaccines or mandates. They dismissed the rulings that had previously been made, some for and some against.
This in no way prevents or inhibits legal opposition. It can very well be seen as a set back, because if (when?) the federal govt tried to implement vaccine mandates in the future, cases would be have to be brought again, because the legal precedents that were set were vacated, meaning they were wiped in terms of having legal precedent.
Framing this as "striking down any legal opposition to " mandates etc, is extremely bogus. It's not factual.
I suggest you might not get as many clicks if you actually just stick to factual information instead of posting things with narrative spin, but you'd be doing the board a favor by practicing a higher standard and not encouraging hyper emotionalized reactions that merely stimulate narrative spin as opposed to clear thinking, objective evaluation and free thought.
$0.02
Came here to say this. Injunctive relief is extraordinary relief. Once the mandate was removed there is nothing for the courts to hear. That's why Biden Admin vacated the mandate before there could be a ruling.