I doubt it, if that were true what reason would there be in delaying going after them more aggressively? Haven't we been told for years we had to be careful going after them until the worst of what they could do in retaliation or as a deterrent had been neutralized?
I doubt it, if that were true what reason would there be in delaying going after them more aggressively? Haven't we been told for years we had to be careful going after them until the worst of what they could do in retaliation or as a deterrent had been neutralized?